RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

["Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Dan.

 

From: Reed, Daniel A [mailto:dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 12 June 2014 18:26
To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

 

Transparency on decision processes is what I hear most often with respect to
the ICANN board (relates to bypassing processes).

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2014 7:37 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] ICANN 50: GNSO Council Meeting with the ICANN Board

 

All,

 

Please can you provide input as to the topics your SG and/or Constituency
would like to see the Council (bearing in mind the role and function of the
Council) raise and discuss with the ICANN board in our meeting in London.

 

A couple of ideas:

 

-          An update on key themes of the work of the Council and associated
policy work in the GNSO (Keeping this very short)

o   GNSO / GAC CG

o   PDP improvements

o   Other?

-          Effective and appropriate management of policy work in the ICANN
structures. 
A point related to concerns over bypassing policy processes.  Has this
improved, got worse or stayed the same?

-          A N Other

 

 

Jonathan