Re: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
Jonathan, I am ok with these changes as well. Thanks, Thomas Am 05.06.2014 um 17:29 schrieb Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Thank-you Brian, > > These seem reasonable to me. > > Hopefully to Thomas as well. > > Jonathan > > From: Winterfeldt, Brian J. [mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: 05 June 2014 13:38 > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council > > Dear Jonathan: > > I wish to offer the following amendment, on behalf of the IPC, to the first > motion on our agenda—namely the motion to initiate a PDP on access to > curative rights protection mechanisms. > > The GNSO Council hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate: (i) whether the UDRP > and/or URS should be amended (to enable their access and use by IGOs and > INGOs whose identifiers had been recommended for protection by the IGO-INGO > PDP WG); and (ii) if so, in what way;, or (ii) whether a separate > narrowly-tailored procedure modeled on these curative rights protection > measures to apply only to protected IGO and INGO identifiers should be > developed. > > I would ask that the Council also consider implementing a similar amendment > within the PDP WG Charter itself. I do hope that these minor changes will be > accepted as friendly, as their primary goal is to align the language more > closely with the recommendation in the final issues report (which follows) > and delineate two clear options. > > Staff therefore recommends that the GNSO Council commence a PDP on the > specific issue described in this Issue Report, i.e. exploring whether the > UDRP and URS should be amended, and if so in what way; or whether a separate > narrowly tailored procedure designed, to enable curative protection for IGOs > and INGOs should be developed. > > In short, as it stands, I think the semicolon and numeral (ii) are slightly > out of place, and might confuse two otherwise very clear options for the WG > to consider. > > I look forward to discussing this suggested amendment with everyone on our > call. > > Thank you, > > Brian > > Brian J. Winterfeldt > Head of Internet Practice > Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP > 2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118 > p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244 > brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx / www.kattenlaw.com > > From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn Behalf OfGlen de Saint Géry > Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:11:48 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada) > To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council > > The motions have been posted on page : > https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+5+June+2014 > > Thank you. > Kind regards, > > Glen > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On > Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson > Sent: mardi 27 mai 2014 00:55 > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council > Importance: High > > All, > > Please see attached for two proposed motions for the next council meeting. > > Ordinarily, I expect that these would have come to you from Thomas Rickert as > chair of the PDP WG that developed the recommendation for the Issue Report. > > However, since Thomas is currently on vacation, I have decided to propose the > motions. > > Thanks, > > Jonathan > =========================================================== > CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before > the Internal Revenue > Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be > used and cannot be used > by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed > on the taxpayer. > =========================================================== > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: > This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information > intended for the exclusive > use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain > information that is > proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under > applicable law. If you > are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, > copying, disclosure or > distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or > sanction. Please notify > the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and > delete the original > message without making any copies. > =========================================================== > NOTIFICATION: Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability > partnership that has > elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997). > =========================================================== > Attachment:
signature.asc
|