ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
  • From: "Winterfeldt, Brian J." <brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2014 12:37:35 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac+Auu2ROucDwJqjQACKFI9EJ0Kq1w==
  • Thread-topic: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council

Dear Jonathan:

I wish to offer the following amendment, on behalf of the IPC, to the first 
motion on our agenda-namely the motion to initiate a PDP on access to curative 
rights protection mechanisms.

The GNSO Council hereby initiates a PDP to evaluate: (i) whether the UDRP 
and/or URS should be amended (to enable their access and use by IGOs and INGOs 
whose identifiers had been recommended for protection by the IGO-INGO PDP WG); 
and (ii) if so, in what way;, or (ii) whether a separate narrowly-tailored 
procedure modeled on these curative rights protection measures to apply only to 
protected IGO and INGO identifiers should be developed.

I would ask that the Council also consider implementing a similar amendment 
within the PDP WG Charter itself.  I do hope that these minor changes will be 
accepted as friendly, as their primary goal is to align the language more 
closely with the recommendation in the final issues report (which follows) and 
delineate two clear options.

Staff therefore recommends that the GNSO Council commence a PDP on the specific 
issue described in this Issue Report, i.e. exploring whether the UDRP and URS 
should be amended, and if so in what way; or whether a separate narrowly 
tailored procedure designed, to enable curative protection for IGOs and INGOs 
should be developed.

In short, as it stands, I think the semicolon and numeral (ii) are slightly out 
of place, and might confuse two otherwise very clear options for the WG to 
consider.

I look forward to discussing this suggested amendment with everyone on our call.

Thank you,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Head of Internet Practice
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244
brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> / 
www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>

________________________________
From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn> 
Behalf OfGlen de Saint Géry
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 4:11:48 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
The motions have been posted on page :
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+5+June+2014

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: mardi 27 mai 2014 00:55
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] IGO INGO Final Issue Report & Motion for Council
Importance: High

All,

Please see attached for two proposed motions for the next council meeting.

Ordinarily, I expect that these would have come to you from Thomas Rickert as 
chair of the PDP WG that developed the recommendation for the Issue Report.

However, since Thomas is currently on vacation, I have decided to propose the 
motions.

Thanks,

Jonathan

===========================================================
CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: Pursuant to Regulations Governing Practice Before the 
Internal Revenue
Service, any tax advice contained herein is not intended or written to be used 
and cannot be used
by a taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties that may be imposed on 
the taxpayer.
===========================================================
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:
This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive
use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is
proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law.  If you
are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, 
copying, disclosure or
distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction.  Please notify
the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and 
delete the original
message without making any copies.
===========================================================
NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability 
partnership that has
elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).
===========================================================


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>