Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda

["Reed, Daniel A" <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>]

That reference will stick with me all day ...

On Mar 24, 2014, at 9:02 AM, "John Berard" 
<johnberard@xxxxxxx<mailto:johnberard@xxxxxxx>> wrote:

To quote Gary Gilmore, "Let's do it!"

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:49 AM, "Mike O'Connor" 
<mike@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

i’m in.

m

On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Thomas Rickert 
<rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Same here!

Thomas


Am 24.03.2014 um 05:25 schrieb Reed, Daniel A 
<dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>>:

Likewise

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Magaly Pazello
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:32 AM
To: Amr Elsadr
Cc: Avri Doria; GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda

+1

Magaly

On Sunday, March 23, 2014, Amr Elsadr 
<aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
> So do I. I believe this discussion is overdue. Thanks for suggesting it, 
> James.
>
> Amr
>
> On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>> 
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I support including the discussion item in the agenda.
>>
>> avri
>>
>> On 23-Mar-14 20:26, James M. Bladel wrote:
>>> Councilors:
>>>
>>> As discussed, here is my proposal agenda add (vetted by Maria & Thomas)
>>> for a discussion during Wednesday’s open session.  Would be happy to
>>> hear comments/edits.
>>>
>>> Thanks—
>>>
>>> J.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> *Discussion item: Data retention waiver and the apparent conflict of
>>> national data protection laws with the 2013 RAA *
>>>
>>> Many European registrars have expressed frustration with ICANN’s
>>> handling of their waiver requests from the Data Retention requirements
>>> under the 2013 RAA, particularly considering recent statements by
>>> various data protection authorities that these requirements violate
>>> national privacy laws. Other ICANN stakeholders have expressed concern
>>> about the treatment of legal data protection requirements when the ICANN
>>> contract appears to conflict with certain laws. Still other stakeholders
>>> are concerned that the ability of law enforcement and private
>>> enforcement actions to access data be kept in place. The RAA includes
>>> language that allows ICANN to temporarily suspend enforcement of the
>>> data retention provisions.  As this situation has now been ongoing for
>>> over six months, pending a resolution of the issue, should the GNSO
>>> Council and larger ICANN Community direct ICANN Staff to suspend
>>> enforcement for any registrar requesting a waiver?
>>>
>
>
>



PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: 
www.haven2.com<http://www.haven2.com>, HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, 
Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)