<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda
- From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 12:26:27 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHPRpMc1WU7Sp9SOUameEWV1k/1zQ==
- Thread-topic: Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda
Councilors:
As discussed, here is my proposal agenda add (vetted by Maria & Thomas) for a
discussion during Wednesday's open session. Would be happy to hear
comments/edits.
Thanks-
J.
________________________________
Discussion item: Data retention waiver and the apparent conflict of national
data protection laws with the 2013 RAA
Many European registrars have expressed frustration with ICANN's handling of
their waiver requests from the Data Retention requirements under the 2013 RAA,
particularly considering recent statements by various data protection
authorities that these requirements violate national privacy laws. Other ICANN
stakeholders have expressed concern about the treatment of legal data
protection requirements when the ICANN contract appears to conflict with
certain laws. Still other stakeholders are concerned that the ability of law
enforcement and private enforcement actions to access data be kept in place.
The RAA includes language that allows ICANN to temporarily suspend enforcement
of the data retention provisions. As this situation has now been ongoing for
over six months, pending a resolution of the issue, should the GNSO Council and
larger ICANN Community direct ICANN Staff to suspend enforcement for any
registrar requesting a waiver?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|