Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda

[John Berard <johnberard@xxxxxxx>]

To quote Gary Gilmore, "Let's do it!"

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

> On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:49 AM, "Mike O'Connor" <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> i’m in.
> 
> m
> 
>> On Mar 24, 2014, at 8:13 AM, Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Same here!
>> 
>> Thomas
>> 
>> 
>>> Am 24.03.2014 um 05:25 schrieb Reed, Daniel A <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> 
>>> Likewise
>>>  
>>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
>>> Behalf Of Magaly Pazello
>>> Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 11:32 AM
>>> To: Amr Elsadr
>>> Cc: Avri Doria; GNSO Council List
>>> Subject: Re: [council] Proposed addition to Wednesday Agenda
>>>  
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> Magaly
>>> 
>>> On Sunday, March 23, 2014, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > So do I. I believe this discussion is overdue. Thanks for suggesting it, 
>>> > James.
>>> >
>>> > Amr
>>> >
>>> > On Mar 23, 2014, at 8:30 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi,
>>> >>
>>> >> I support including the discussion item in the agenda.
>>> >>
>>> >> avri
>>> >>
>>> >> On 23-Mar-14 20:26, James M. Bladel wrote:
>>> >>> Councilors:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> As discussed, here is my proposal agenda add (vetted by Maria & Thomas)
>>> >>> for a discussion during Wednesday’s open session.  Would be happy to
>>> >>> hear comments/edits.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Thanks—
>>> >>>
>>> >>> J.
>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>
>>> >>> *Discussion item: Data retention waiver and the apparent conflict of
>>> >>> national data protection laws with the 2013 RAA *
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Many European registrars have expressed frustration with ICANN’s
>>> >>> handling of their waiver requests from the Data Retention requirements
>>> >>> under the 2013 RAA, particularly considering recent statements by
>>> >>> various data protection authorities that these requirements violate
>>> >>> national privacy laws. Other ICANN stakeholders have expressed concern
>>> >>> about the treatment of legal data protection requirements when the ICANN
>>> >>> contract appears to conflict with certain laws. Still other stakeholders
>>> >>> are concerned that the ability of law enforcement and private
>>> >>> enforcement actions to access data be kept in place. The RAA includes
>>> >>> language that allows ICANN to temporarily suspend enforcement of the
>>> >>> data retention provisions.  As this situation has now been ongoing for
>>> >>> over six months, pending a resolution of the issue, should the GNSO
>>> >>> Council and larger ICANN Community direct ICANN Staff to suspend
>>> >>> enforcement for any registrar requesting a waiver?
>>> >>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
> 
> 
> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: 
> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.)
>