ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA

  • To: Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
  • From: Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:31:44 -0400
  • Cc: Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Wendy Seltzer <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=kbOJmqxAh22BsRuGj5fjAo6w4SKrVxBfHygsbUjrhR8=; b=G7xlumHZDc3wiliuLhFB+Wxj7kLgNsemumoc0UCSAKmFDU3JWBPv7iZD5BzJYIxOcR QKGf3HUC5cQH9dzDCzl5IUf5tnSDM5jIBHe8PFPtX8gbBb2/rEMm9GES10nCKKKKyz2t gvTbUP7kZaRfY88mnm/FnEtv5epC8LonDQOPW33lb0huYhQEg57cPa5HRMApG2+Xz40p W1CbVuF09m/x3D02tKdJAo7LnnrXWuBWoSuKYFvKoAXQIq//nsfDX9o28oAFdZw1h1LL imJSzAdL8DYWSe4Mxob755Yw/lDgmsrL9aFOtZOR+g2Udrit5uubAYdC7AuW7i112agW 1DAw==
  • In-reply-to: <B438E73E-724B-44E0-B93E-32384BE4D340@anwaelte.de>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <515B777F.9000306@seltzer.com> <03ba01ce305e$3ad63920$b082ab60$@ipracon.com> <B438E73E-724B-44E0-B93E-32384BE4D340@anwaelte.de>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4
Thank you Thomas and Jonathan,
I'll look forward to our discussion in Beijing.  (Jonathan, I hope your
flight makes it!)

--Wendy

On 04/03/2013 08:41 AM, Thomas Rickert wrote:
> I am happy to second the motion!
> 
> Thomas
> 
> =============
> thomas-rickert.tel
> +49.228.74.898.0
> 
> Am 03.04.2013 um 13:27 schrieb "Jonathan Robinson" 
> <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
>>
>> Thanks Wendy,
>>
>> Technically, this just missed the deadline but personally I have no
>> objections on this basis.
>> Providing no objections are received, I suggest we proceed as though it did
>> not miss the deadline.
>>
>> Do we have a second for this motion?
>>
>> Jonathan
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
>> Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
>> Sent: 03 April 2013 01:28
>> To: Council GNSO
>> Subject: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
>>
>>
>> I'd like to propose the following motion for the Beijing meeting (resending
>> from the correct address):
>>
>> Whereas the most recently posted draft Registrar Accreditation Agreement
>> (RAA) has raised serious concerns of policy among most of the stakeholder
>> groups in the GNSO [see Minutes of March call];
>>
>> Whereas ICANN negotiators have held it out as a blocker to the
>> implementation of the New gTLD Program;
>>
>> Resolved, Council recommends that ICANN permit Registrars to extend the
>> rights and obligations in the current RAA and its renewals to new gTLDs
>> until such time as the GNSO adopts a consensus supporting the policy changes
>> in any proposed new RAA.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --Wendy
>>
>> --
>> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613 Policy Counsel, World
>> Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at
>> Harvard University Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society
>> Project http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/
>> https://www.torproject.org/ http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>