Re: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA

[Thomas Rickert <rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am happy to second the motion!

Thomas

=============
thomas-rickert.tel
+49.228.74.898.0

Am 03.04.2013 um 13:27 schrieb "Jonathan Robinson" 
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 
> Thanks Wendy,
> 
> Technically, this just missed the deadline but personally I have no
> objections on this basis.
> Providing no objections are received, I suggest we proceed as though it did
> not miss the deadline.
> 
> Do we have a second for this motion?
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Wendy Seltzer
> Sent: 03 April 2013 01:28
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Proposed Motion on RAA
> 
> 
> I'd like to propose the following motion for the Beijing meeting (resending
> from the correct address):
> 
> Whereas the most recently posted draft Registrar Accreditation Agreement
> (RAA) has raised serious concerns of policy among most of the stakeholder
> groups in the GNSO [see Minutes of March call];
> 
> Whereas ICANN negotiators have held it out as a blocker to the
> implementation of the New gTLD Program;
> 
> Resolved, Council recommends that ICANN permit Registrars to extend the
> rights and obligations in the current RAA and its renewals to new gTLDs
> until such time as the GNSO adopts a consensus supporting the policy changes
> in any proposed new RAA.
> 
> Thanks,
> --Wendy
> 
> --
> Wendy Seltzer -- wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx +1 617.863.0613 Policy Counsel, World
> Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet & Society at
> Harvard University Visiting Fellow, Yale Law School Information Society
> Project http://wendy.seltzer.org/ https://www.chillingeffects.org/
> https://www.torproject.org/ http://www.freedom-to-tinker.com/
>