Re: RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing

["Petter Rindforth" <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,
 
Sorry to hear that Maria cannot participate.
 
I will be there and is still "passionate about participating" ;-)
Best,
Petter
-- 
Petter Rindforth, LL M
Fenix Legal KB
Stureplan 4c, 4tr
114 35 Stockholm
Sweden
Fax: +46(0)8-4631010
Direct phone: +46(0)702-369360
E-mail: <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
<http://www.fenixlegal.eu/>
NOTICE
This e-mail message is intended solely for the individual or individuals
to whom it is addressed. It may contain confidential attorney-client
privileged information and attorney work product. If the reader of this
message is not the intended recipient, you are requested not to read,
copy or distribute it or any of the information it contains. Please
delete it immediately and notify us by return e-mail.
Fenix Legal KB, Sweden, <http://www.fenixlegal.eu/>
Thank you
On 18 mar 2013 17:57 "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> All,
>  
> In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of
> interest as follows:
>  
> Petter Rindforth <<petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Joy Liddicoat <<joy@xxxxxxx>>
> Ching Chiao  <<chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> Maria Farrell  <<maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>>
> Wendy Seltzer  <wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>  
> However, ideally we’d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our
> ccNSO liaison, John Berard.
> It looks like the ccNSO will have 2.
>  
> So … two questions:
>  
> 1.      John Berard – Are you available as part of this group?
> 2.      From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly
> passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not
> participating?
>  
> Thank-you.
>  
>  
> Jonathan
>  
> From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf OfJonathan Robinson
> Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
>  
> All,
>  
> We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a
> scheduled a meeting slot to do so.  In order for it to go ahead and
> have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.
>  
> Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the
> potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including
> those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and
> possibly others on our mailing list.  The objective in talking with
> Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas which are
> likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an agreed way for
> developing and preparing for these for discussion together. 
>  
> We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a
> non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as
> follows:
>  
> 1.      Providing input and advice, often at short notice. 
> A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various
> requests that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or
> input, often at short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked
> to current scheduled work.  This discussion topic could include and
> link into the broader issue and experience of capacity planning, work
> group participation and work scheduling and planning where the ccNSO
> has some interesting approaches.
> 2.      The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. 
> How significant might this be and are existing structures and
> approaches adequate to absorb and deal with this?
> 3.      Global Internet Governance. 
> Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact
> on ICANN and the multi-stakeholder model.  Shared experiences from
> global forums and the issues and lessons arriving.
>  
> We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some
> or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best
> handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO.
> This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the past.  The
> group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and
> include the liaisons (if not already one of the two) so making a
> manageable small group of 4-6 people.
>  
> I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something
> similar and look forward to any comments or input.  If you would like
> to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and plan for
> this session, please do so.
>  
> Thank-you,
>  
>  
> Jonathan
>