Re: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing

[joy <joy@xxxxxxx>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all -
Not sure if you got my note yesterday Jonathan with ideas for this
session? I'd like to participate if possible, but not if the
competition for space is unseemly :-)
Best
Joy

On 19/03/2013 5:57 a.m., Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> All,
> 
> 
> 
> In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of 
> interest as follows:
> 
> 
> 
> Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> 
> Joy Liddicoat <joy@xxxxxxx <mailto:joy@xxxxxxx>>
> 
> Ching Chiao  <chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
> 
> Maria Farrell  <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>>
> 
> Wendy Seltzer  wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> However, ideally we?d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including
> our ccNSO liaison, John Berard.
> 
> It looks like the ccNSO will have 2.
> 
> 
> 
> So ? two questions:
> 
> 
> 
> 1.       John Berard ? Are you available as part of this group?
> 
> 2.       From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly 
> passionate about participating and / or not too worried about not 
> participating?
> 
> 
> 
> Thank-you.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
> *From:*owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Jonathan
> Robinson *Sent:* 13 March 2013 18:14 *To:* council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> *Subject:* [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
> 
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> 
> 
> We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a 
> scheduled a meeting slot to do so.  In order for it to go ahead and
> have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in
> advance.
> 
> 
> 
> Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss
> the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items,
> including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and
> Petter and possibly others on our mailing list.  The objective in
> talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas
> which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an
> agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion
> together.
> 
> 
> 
> We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a
> non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as
> follows:
> 
> 
> 
> 1.       Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A
> discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the
> various requests that come to both of our groups in order to
> provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable
> times, and not linked to current scheduled work.  This discussion
> topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience
> of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling
> and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
> 
> 2.       The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this
> be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb
> and deal with this?
> 
> 3.       Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an
> international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the
> multi-stakeholder model.  Shared experiences from global forums and
> the issues and lessons arriving.
> 
> 
> 
> We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing
> some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was
> best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO &
> ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the
> past.  The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO
> and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two)
> so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
> 
> 
> 
> I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something 
> similar and look forward to any comments or input.  If you would
> like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and
> plan for this session, please do so.
> 
> 
> 
> Thank-you,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Jonathan
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRR4jWAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqVnAH/RhLKkuaxkpGfGxQNpM0qC6+
xXpy5tM6V5bCuvh3mFj7aVm6CA8CcSUEC7J579CzEyNcQF4Gkn7Rr3npA752WLT2
R6rHH0j/MpIN7fn33jhrB0df9tM67evylmcU/7cmHSRopZ2hSDc9K5s+rqhj6mgr
MYiaJ2GIrsh5m0d6mL7EZXevZzLNUJjfX+btlcDjsFRvT243SefTXVnHPZUNQcgs
ncOrHBUUDicAabDNcHNG9gFeqNrjiUbad9J2M+Z8Dh84URO3NcdetanZX+vnDaJP
iZZgFVwEGCVBlkliohKjEUPYfwHk2Poymma7lWAC09+iOp6Lc5b4eXwMYBZEGWw=
=43w2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----