<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
- To: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
- From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 10:31:45 -0700
- In-reply-to: <02a901ce23f9$b08f4010$11adc030$@ipracon.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: MailAPI 24190
Jonathan,
I am happy to participate in the planning. What are the day/time particulars
or will it be done asynchronously by email?
Cheers,
Berard
--------- Original Message ---------Subject: RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in
Beijing
From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 3/18/13 9:57 am
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
All,
In response to this note, we received a number of expressions of interest as
follows:
Petter Rindforth <petter.rindforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Joy Liddicoat <joy@xxxxxxx>
Ching Chiao <chiao@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Wendy Seltzer wendy@xxxxxxxxxxx
However, ideally we’d like to keep the group to 2 or 3, including our ccNSO
liaison, John Berard.
It looks like the ccNSO will have 2.
So … two questions:
1. John Berard – Are you available as part of this group?
2. From the other volunteers, are any of you particularly passionate
about participating and / or not too worried about not participating?
Thank-you.
Jonathan
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: 13 March 2013 18:14
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing
All,
We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a scheduled a
meeting slot to do so. In order for it to go ahead and have a good chance of
succeeding, we need to plan for it in advance.
Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss the potential
for the meeting and the possible agenda items, including those which had been
suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and Petter and possibly others on our mailing
list. The objective in talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a
number of areas which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an
agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion together.
We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a non-exclusive
short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as follows:
1. Providing input and advice, often at short notice.
A discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the various requests
that come to both of our groups in order to provide advice or input, often at
short notice or at unpredictable times, and not linked to current scheduled
work. This discussion topic could include and link into the broader issue and
experience of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling
and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
2. The impact of gTLDs on ICANN.
How significant might this be and are existing structures and approaches
adequate to absorb and deal with this?
3. Global Internet Governance.
Looking at issues on an international level and how these may impact on ICANN
and the multi-stakeholder model. Shared experiences from global forums and the
issues and lessons arriving.
We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing some or all of
the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was best handled by a smaller
group comprised of members of both GNSO & ccNSO. This type of approach as
worked well for the ccNSO in the past. The group could comprise a couple of
reps from each of GNSO and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one
of the two) so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something similar and
look forward to any comments or input. If you would like to volunteer to be on
the small group which will organise and plan for this session, please do so.
Thank-you,
Jonathan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|