<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FW: Letter from the GAC regarding IOC/RC Protections
- To: "'John Berard'" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] FW: Letter from the GAC regarding IOC/RC Protections
- From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2012 14:30:57 -0000
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <C43F33D9-01D3-4F14-AB62-FE37414B8956@crediblecontext.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CCDBC434.2D4FC%gacsec@gac.icann.org> <003d01cdce18$4855ec60$d901c520$@ipracon.com> <C43F33D9-01D3-4F14-AB62-FE37414B8956@crediblecontext.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQGhZtxupKB6N9SddJmu5NlJ7KhSPgHgiHlWAa2M8lSYXj3+oA==
All,
Regarding Observers, the GNSO Operating Procedures provide for the following
(My emphasis)
The GNSO Council may agree with the Council of any other ICANN Supporting
Organization or
Advisory Committee to exchange observers. Such observers shall not be members
of, or entitled
to vote or make motions on, the GNSO Council, but otherwise shall be entitled
to participate on
equal footing with members of the GNSO Council. The appointing Council shall
designate its
observer (or revoke or change the designation of its observer) on the GNSO
Council by
providing written notice to the Chair of the GNSO Council and to the ICANN
Secretary.
My sense is that the GAC do not see this as something they wish to take up.
However, my thought is that it is something we should remind them of and make
sure that they at least consider it.
Jonathan
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of John Berard
Sent: 29 November 2012 15:02
To: Jonathan Robinson
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: Letter from the GAC regarding IOC/RC Protections
Jonathan,
First, this letter makes me more certain we should be emphatic about getting a
GAC observer on the Council.
Second, I have heard Jeff Neuman's comment on clarifying what is policy and
what is implementation and I agree.
Third, until the GNSO structure changes, the GAC advises the Board and if there
are policy questions, the Board engages the Council. Where is the Board on
this direct advice to the Council?
Four, look forward to the next Council meeting!
Cheers,
Berard
Sent from my iPhone
On Nov 29, 2012, at 4:59 AM, "Jonathan Robinson"
<jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
All,
FYI. Please see the attached letter received from the GAC last night my time.
Jonathan
From: GAC Secretariat [mailto:gacsec@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 28 November 2012 21:38
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Steve Crocker; Fadi Chehade; Heather Dryden; Maria Häll; alice@xxxxxxx;
Choon Sai LIM (IDA)
Subject: Letter from the GAC regarding IOC/RC Protections
Sent on behalf of Heather Dryden, GAC Chair
Dear Jonathan,
Attached please find a letter from the GAC regarding IOC and Red Cross/Red
Crescent protections.
Best regards,
Jeannie Ellers
Jeannie Ellers
Manager, GAC Coordination
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers
1101 New York Avenue NW, Suite 930
Washington, DC 20005
Ph. +1 202 570 7135
M. +1 310 302 7552
<GAC_GNSOCouncil_20121128.pdf>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|