[council] RE: GNSO Council Meeting Agenda / 13 September 2012 at 15:00 UTC
Thank you very much. The agenda will be modified accordingly and redistributed.
The motion is posted on page:
Glen de Saint Géry
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: mercredi 5 septembre 2012 10:55
To: Glen de Saint Géry; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: GNSO Council Meeting Agenda / 13 September 2012 at 15:00 UTC
to make everybody aware item 2.2 shall read "Approve consent
updated voting results table in the GNSO operating
Please add item 2.3. Approve technical change in proxy notification
A motion combining 2.2 and 2.3 is attached.
Im Auftrag von Glen de Saint Géry
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. September 2012 19:38
An: GNSO Council List
Betreff: [council] GNSO Council Meeting Agenda / 13 September 2012 at 15:00 UTC
The Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on 13 September 2012 at 15:00 UTC is
posted on page
and on the Wiki at:
Reminder: Reports, motions and documents for consideration are due no later
than (NLT) 8 days in advance (i.e.WEDNESDAY, 5 September 2012) of the GNSO
Council meeting on 13 September 2012 at 15:00 UTC.
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures
approved 22 September 2011 for the GNSO Council and updated.
* An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
* An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Meeting Times 15:00 UTC<http://tinyurl.com/bojlrbx>
Coordinated Universal Time 15:00 UTC
08:00 Los Angeles; 11:00 Washington; 16:00 London; 17:00 Paris; 00:00 Tokyo.
Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors should
notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
GNSO Council meeting audiocast
Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the GNSO
Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 20 July
on 22 August 2012.
1.5. GNSO Pending Projects List
* Review main changes.
* Comments and/or questions.
Item 2: Consent agenda (5 minutes)
A consent agenda item is being added as a standard agenda item to provide for a
simplified process to obtain Council approval on specific tasks.
2.1 Approve proposed IRD-WG letter from GNSO Council to ICANN
2.2 Approve consent
agenda<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/consent-agenda-09jul12-en.pdf> in the
Item 3: RAP recommendation on Uniformity of Reporting 10 minutes)
At its meeting on 6 October, the GNSO Council requested the ICANN Compliance
Department to report on existing systems to report and track violations and/or
complaints; improvements made since the RAPWG Report or foreseen in the near
future, and: indentify gaps and any improvements that might be desirable but
not foreseen at this stage.
The ICANN Compliance Team submitted its report on 18 March and presented it to
the GNSO Council at its meeting on 12 April. Refer to the report
The Council must now decide what next steps to take, if any.
from Mikey O'Connor.
3.3 Nest steps.
Item 4: Whois Review Team Final Report (10 minutes)
At its July 20, 2012 meeting, the Council created a small group to draft a
letter in response to ICANN Board resolved #2012.06.23.26 (see Board resolution
The August 31, 2012 deadline set by the Board for receiving input proved too
short for the Council, and on August 30, 2012 GNSO Chair Stéphane Van Gelder
sent Chairman of the ICANN Board Steve Crocker and Interim ICANN CEO Akram
Attalah a letter<http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/33821> informing them that the
Council would hopefully be providing further input very soon.
A draft has been proposed by the group. The Council must now decide whether to
send this draft as-is or not.
4.1 Update from group (Brian Winterfeldt)
4. 2 Discussion
4. 3 Next steps.
Item 5: WHOIS Proxy/Privacy Reveal & Relay Feasibility Survey Report (10
This survey evaluated the feasibility of conducting a future in-depth study
into communication Relay and identity Reveal requests sent for gTLD domain
names registered using Proxy and Privacy services. The Interisle Consulting
Group has completed this survey and initial results have been reported, and
explored in a community webinar held on 13 August. This item is an overview of
the final report to be published in mid-September, and an examination of
possible next steps for the GNSO Council to consider.
5.1 Update from Staff (Barbara Roseman)
5.3 Next steps
Item 6: Fake Renewal Notices (10 minutes)
The GNSO Council requested that a small group prepare a request for information
concerning Fake Renewal Notices for the Registrar Stakeholder Group to help
inform its deliberations on the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAP
WG) Recommendation on Fake Renewal Notices (#2).
Once the drafting team submitted its report to the GNSO Council and the comment
period was completed, the GNSO Council requested the Drafting Team to review
the comments received, update the report if deemed appropriate and report back
The DT has reviewed the comments received and submitted its updated report to
the GNSO Council on 21 June 2012 (see
and the DT Chair presented this report to the Council at the July 20 meeting.
At that meeting, the Council opted to have further consultations with the
Registrar Stakeholder Group to find out what solutions the Registrars can offer
to deal with bad actors and return to the Council with proposals for options,
or solutions, or next steps on this issue.
This agenda item is an update on those consultations.
6.1 Update from RrSG (Mason Cole)
6.3 Next steps
Item 7: Final Issue Report on Protection of International Organizations (15
The Preliminary Issue Report on the protection of international organization
names requested by the GNSO Council on 12 April was published and a public
comment forum was opened on 4 June.
The GNSO Drafting Team is evaluating possible recommendations to protect the
Red Cross and IOC names at the second level and staff has now published the
Final Issue Report, since the Public Comment forum has closed.
This item is an overview of that report and an examination of possible next
7.1 Update from Staff (Brian Peck)
7.3 Next steps
Item 8: Impact of new gTLDs on ICANN's structure (10 minutes)
The new gTLD program will have a significant impact on the functioning of ICANN
and its structure. The Board has called for an in-depth community discussion to
identify early the corresponding challenges and possible evolutions.
A call has been put out for the community to share a one-pager on this topic to
gather preliminary views and help prepare a dedicated session in Toronto. The
GNSO Council has expressed a desire to respond to this call and a small group
has been created to draft a response.
Although the Board has called for a response by September 10, this is not a
hard deadline so the Council will now consider whether to approve the proposed
8.1 Update on draft response (Thomas Rickert)
8.3 Call to approve sending response to the Board
Item 9: Overview of schedule for Toronto (10 minutes)
As usual, work is ongoing on preparing the GNSO's work schedule for the
upcoming ICANN international meeting. This includes the GNSO's weekend working
sessions and Wednesday's Open Council Meeting.
9.1 Update on Toronto agenda (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
9.2 Discussion and review of any amendments to agenda
Item 10: Toronto GAC High Level Meeting (15 minutes)
The GAC is organizing a High Level Meeting on October 15 in Toronto. The agenda
for this meeting includes an exchange with SO/AC leadership. Following a
clarification request by the GNSO leadership, the GAC leadership has given the
following explanation on its expectations for the meeting: "I would recommend
preparation of Qs and lining up speakers in advance. I trust that the GNSO
leadership will work with the GAC, as well as my Canadian colleagues, to find a
balance between the differing cultures of the GNSO, and senior officials and
politicians unfamiliar with the ICANN environment, to have a positive and
productive exchange to reinforce and improve the multi-stakeholder model."
The Council should therefore plan for this meeting and discuss possible
questions it may want to raise.
10.1 Introduction and overview of meeting (Stéphane Van Gelder)
Item 11: Management of work (10 minutes)
Recent discussions on the Council list have raised concerns about the volume of
documents published prior to an ICANN meeting and how these can best be managed
by the volunteer community that makes up the GNSO Council as it struggles to
read a substantial amount of reports and other documents in order to better
inform its own decision making processes with regards to policy.
Item 12: Any Other Business (5 minutes)
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3)
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting‟s adjournment. In
exceptional circumstances,announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 15:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-5+1DST 11:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+1DST 16:00
Tunis, Tunisia (CET) UTC+1+0DST 16:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 17:00
Paris, France (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 17:00
) UTC+5+0DST 20:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 23:00
Wellington, New Zealand
) UTC+12+0DST 03:00 next day
The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2012, 2:00 or 3:00 local time
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com and http://tinyurl.com/bojlrbx
Glen de Saint Géry