Re: [council] NOT-Swapping-BUT ADDING in IOC/RC for Fake Renewal

[Zahid Jamil <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

Would it be possible to replace Elections discussion and Management work items 
and replace it with IOC/RC/IGO - we can discuss that even at a later council 
call.  This maintains our substantive agenda and also includes IOC/RC/IGO 
discussion.



Best regards, 

Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 21 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 21 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com

Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the 
intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.

Sent from my iPad

On 27 Jun 2012, at 12:28, "Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I would support an agenda item with respect to IC/RC/IGOs.
> 
> Zahid Jamil
> Barrister-at-law
> Jamil & Jamil
> Barristers-at-law
> 219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
> Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
> Cell: +923008238230
> Tel: +92 213 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
> Fax: +92 213 5655026
> www.jamilandjamil.com
> 
> Notice / Disclaimer
> This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
> communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
> recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
> notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
> mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are 
> the intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
> privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
> reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind 
> whatsoever of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any 
> medium by electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some 
> other use of this communication) without prior written permission and consent 
> of Jamil & Jamil is prohibited.
> 
> 
> *** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from 
> Mobilink ***
> From: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:14:57 +0200
> To: Alan Greenberg<alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>; 
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [council] Swapping in IOC/RC for Fake Renewal
> 
> In light of Alan's request and energy around the above noted protections, can 
> we swap one for the other at the public meeting?
> 
> Berard
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I will unfortunately have to leave the meeting early this afternoon. If a 
>> way can be found to defer this discussion until the next Council meeting, I 
>> would appreciate it. Given the schedule change, perhaps this will happen in 
>> any case.
>> 
>> Alan
>> 
>> At 26/06/2012 12:53 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
>>> Item 11: Fake Renewal Notices (10 minutes)
>>> The GNSO Council requested that a small group prepare a request for 
>>> information concerning Fake Renewal Notices for the RrSG to help inform its 
>>> deliberations on the RAP WG Recommendation on Fake Renewal Notices (#2). 
>>> The drafting team submitted its report to the GNSO Council on 6 March. 
>>> Following a presentation of the report to the GNSO Council at the ICANN 
>>> Meeting in Costa Rica, the GNSO Council decided to put the report out for 
>>> public comment. A public comment forum was opened (see 
>>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21mar12-en.htm
>>>  ) and has now closed. At its last meeting, the GNSO Council requested the 
>>> DT to review the comments received, update the report if deemed appropriate 
>>> and report back accordingly. The DT has reviewed the comments received and 
>>> submitted its updated report to the GNSO Council on 21 June (see 
>>> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13234.html).
>>> Presentation of updated Fake Renewal Notices Report (Mikey O'Connor)
>>> Discussion and open microphone
>>> Next steps