<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [council] WhoIs motion
Fully agreed, we should follow-up with the discussin at the council session.
Sorry for having been late.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 12:57
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: [council] WhoIs motion
Wolf,
I find it diffiult to consider the changes made while following discussions on
other important matters. Please do not assume I don't have any comments just
because I could not yet work on that.
Thanks,
Thomas
=============
thomas-rickert.tel
+49.228.74.898.0
Am 27.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>:
No comments have been received so far.
Glen, could you please update the motion by the revised version attached?
Thanks
Wolf-Ulrich
______________________________________________
Von: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 01:06
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: WhoIs motion
All,
following the council discussion last weekend on the WhoIs motion the ISPCP
constituency discussed today the matter and came to the conclusion to provide
this motion in an amended form as attached. I hope this brings more clarity on
the reference as well as on the target.
As there is still room for discussion I would appreciate your comments.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
<ISPCP - Motion to Address Whois.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|