ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

AW: [council] WhoIs motion

Fully agreed, we should follow-up with the discussin at the council session.
Sorry for having been late.

Best regards

Von: Thomas Rickert [mailto:rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 12:57
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff: Re: [council] WhoIs motion

I find it diffiult to consider the changes made while following discussions on 
other important matters. Please do not assume I don't have any comments just 
because I could not yet work on that.



Am 27.06.2012 um 12:18 schrieb <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>>:

No comments have been received so far.

Glen, could you please update the motion by the revised version attached?


Von:     Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Gesendet:       Mittwoch, 27. Juni 2012 01:06
An:     council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Betreff:        WhoIs motion


following the council discussion last weekend on the WhoIs motion the ISPCP 
constituency discussed today the matter and came to the conclusion to provide 
this motion in an amended form as attached. I hope this brings more clarity on 
the reference as well as on the target.
As there is still room for discussion I would appreciate your comments.

Best regards

<ISPCP - Motion to Address Whois.doc>

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>