Re: [council] Swapping in IOC/RC for Fake Renewal

["Zahid Jamil" <zahid@xxxxxxxxx>]

I would support an agenda item with respect to IC/RC/IGOs.


Zahid Jamil
Barrister-at-law
Jamil & Jamil
Barristers-at-law
219-221 Central Hotel Annexe
Merewether Road, Karachi. Pakistan
Cell: +923008238230
Tel: +92 213 5680760 / 5685276 / 5655025
Fax: +92 213 5655026
www.jamilandjamil.com

Notice / Disclaimer
This message contains confidential information and its contents are being 
communicated only for the intended recipients . If you are not the intended 
recipient you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please 
notify the sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this message by 
mistake and delete it from your system. The contents above may contain/are the 
intellectual property of Jamil & Jamil, Barristers-at-Law, and constitute 
privileged information protected by attorney client privilege. The 
reproduction, publication, use, amendment, modification of any kind whatsoever 
of any part or parts (including photocopying or storing it in any medium by 
electronic means whether or not transiently or incidentally or some other use 
of this communication) without prior written permission and consent of Jamil & 
Jamil is prohibited.


*** This Message Has Been Sent Using BlackBerry Internet Service from Mobilink 
***

-----Original Message-----
From: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 12:14:57 
To: Alan Greenberg<alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>; 
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Swapping in IOC/RC for Fake Renewal

In light of Alan's request and energy around the above noted protections, can 
we swap one for the other at the public meeting?

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 27, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I will unfortunately have to leave the meeting early this afternoon. If a way 
> can be found to defer this discussion until the next Council meeting, I would 
> appreciate it. Given the schedule change, perhaps this will happen in any 
> case.
> 
> Alan
> 
> At 26/06/2012 12:53 PM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
>> Item 11: Fake Renewal Notices (10 minutes)
>> The GNSO Council requested that a small group prepare a request for 
>> information concerning Fake Renewal Notices for the RrSG to help inform its 
>> deliberations on the RAP WG Recommendation on Fake Renewal Notices (#2). The 
>> drafting team submitted its report to the GNSO Council on 6 March. Following 
>> a presentation of the report to the GNSO Council at the ICANN Meeting in 
>> Costa Rica, the GNSO Council decided to put the report out for public 
>> comment. A public comment forum was opened (see 
>> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/fake-renewal-notices-report-21mar12-en.htm
>>  ) and has now closed. At its last meeting, the GNSO Council requested the 
>> DT to review the comments received, update the report if deemed appropriate 
>> and report back accordingly. The DT has reviewed the comments received and 
>> submitted its updated report to the GNSO Council on 21 June (see 
>> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg13234.html).
>> Presentation of updated Fake Renewal Notices Report (Mikey O'Connor)
>> Discussion and open microphone
>> Next steps