Re: [council] IOC/RC
- To: "Taylor, David" <David.Taylor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] IOC/RC
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 10:11:10 +0200
- Cc: <jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <D7EF7A1ACE0D2B49AF459EEB0FAA4386268E56@PAREXMBX02.adslocal.net>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D7EF7A1ACE0D2B49AF459EEB0FAA4386268E56@PAREXMBX02.adslocal.net>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So the message would be this?
The Drafting Team is continuing to work on the issue and will provide its
recommendations back to the GNSO Council.
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
Head of Domain Operations
Le 11 mai 2012 à 02:09, Taylor, David a écrit :
> The Drafting Team should keep working in order to provide its recommendations
> back to the GNSO Council.
> Willing and effective volunteers should be cherished.
> David Taylor
> Hogan Lovells International LLP
> 6 avenue Kléber
> 75116 Paris
> Tel:+33 1 53 67 47 47
> Fax:+33 1 53 67 47 48
> From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 11:47 PM
> To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>; GNSO Council List
> Subject: RE: [council] IOC/RC
> I disagreed with Mary’s suggestion on the chat and continue to for a number
> of reasons. First, implicit in Mary’s note is the notion that the Council
> has made the decision to abandon the Drafting Team approach, which is a
> notion I only advocated by the NCSG on the call.
> Second, it sends the wrong message to the current Drafting Team and will make
> it next to impossible for the Drafting Team to get any work done between now
> and Prague. They will not want to do any work on the second level issues as
> they will believe that doing such work would be a waste of their time (Since
> the GNSO as a whole is “continuing to work” on the issue). That feeling has
> already been expressed by several members of the DT (prior to the GNSO
> Council call). There is a strong belief that any future work will be a waste
> of their volunteer time.
> So, if we actually expect the DT to keep working on a response, which was
> what I clearly heard on the call, then let’s just state that the Drafting
> Team is continuing to work on the issue and will provide its recommendations
> back to the GNSO Council. If on the other hand the GNSO as a whole is
> willing to get on calls every two weeks and really work in earnest on the
> response, then I am fine with the message Mary suggests and I expect to see
> you all on the call next Wednesday as scheduled. I am fine with taking
> either approach…the Drafting Team works on it, or the GNSO as a whole works
> on its. But we can’t just state that the GNSO as a whole is working on it,
> and then it turns out no one actually does.
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2012 3:50 PM
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] IOC/RC
> As discussed during today's call, I would like to ask the Council for clear
> direction on what next steps to take on the IOC/RC DT.
> You will recall that on the call I suggested that we instruct the DT to
> continue its work and that a short message be sent to the GAC.
> Mary had the following suggestion on the call:
> Mary Wong: @Stephane, in view of the apparent confusion over the DT issue,
> can you respond to the GAC simply stating what the DT has done to date and
> indicating that the GNSO as a whole is continuing to work on the second level
> issue without specifically mentioning that the DT will be the group doing the
> work? And then including that question on the agenda for our next mtg?
> Please add to this discussion so that we can determine what our next steps
> should be.
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM Group NBT France
> Head of Domain Operations
> Group NBT
> Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in
> England and Wales with registered number OC353350, and is authorised and
> regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority of England and Wales.
> Registered office: Atlantic House, Holborn Viaduct, London EC1A 2FG.
> Hogan Lovells (Paris) LLP is an affiliated business of Hogan Lovells
> International LLP, a limited liability partnership registered in England and
> Wales. "Hogan Lovells" is an international legal practice that includes Hogan
> Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP and their affiliated
> businesses. The word "partner" is used to describe a partner or member of
> Hogan Lovells International LLP, Hogan Lovells US LLP or any of their
> affiliated entities or any employee or consultant with equivalent standing.
> Certain individuals, who are designated as partners, but who are not members
> of Hogan Lovells International LLP, do not hold qualifications equivalent to
> members. For more information about Hogan Lovells, the partners and their
> qualifications, see www.hoganlovells.com.
> This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email is
> marked "officiel". It may also be privileged. If received in error, please do
> not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email
> and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system.