ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] IOC/RC

  • To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] IOC/RC
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <Stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 21:50:13 +0200
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


As discussed during today's call, I would like to ask the Council for clear 
direction on what next steps to take on the IOC/RC DT.

You will recall that on the call I suggested that we instruct the DT to 
continue its work and that a short message be sent to the GAC.

Mary had the following suggestion on the call:

Mary Wong: @Stephane, in view of the apparent confusion over the DT issue, can 
you respond to the GAC simply stating what the DT has done to date and 
indicating that the GNSO as a whole is continuing to work on the second level 
issue without specifically mentioning that the DT will be the group doing the 
work? And then including that question on the agenda for our next mtg?

Please add to this discussion so that we can determine what our next steps 
should be.

Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>