ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] GNSO COuncil agenda 10 May 2012 at 15:00 UTC


Thanks Thomas.

Others?

Stéphane



Le 4 mai 2012 à 10:00, Thomas Rickert a écrit :

> I would like to have both matters on the agenda. 
> 
> Thomas
> 
> 
> Am 04.05.2012 um 09:57 schrieb Stéphane Van Gelder:
> 
>> Thanks Bill.
>> 
>> Fridays was the gist of my question to Council yesterday, i.e. is this an 
>> onlist discussion or one we want to allocate some actual teleconference time 
>> to? Happy to do either. So far, there's only been one request to put this on 
>> the call agenda (Jeff).
>> 
>> On Icann academy, same situation really. I am happy to add an agenda item if 
>> others feel there is something to discuss.
>> 
>> Stéphane
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Stéphane Van Gelder
>> Directeur Général / General manager
>> INDOM Group NBT France
>> ----------------
>> Head of Domain Operations
>> Group NBT
>> 
>> Le 4 mai 2012 à 09:07, William Drake a écrit :
>> 
>>> Hi
>>> 
>>> Just wondering—did we want to talk briefly about either Fridays or ICANN 
>>> Academy?  If We have views on either to share probably it'd be better to do 
>>> so sooner than later, no?
>>> 
>>> Best,
>>> 
>>> Bill
>>> 
>>> On May 4, 2012, at 12:54 AM, Glen de Saint Géry wrote:
>>> 
>>>>  
>>>> Dear All,
>>>>  
>>>> Please find the  Draft Agenda for GNSO Council Meeting – 10 May 2012 at 
>>>> 15:00 UTC.
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-council-10may12-en.htm
>>>>  
>>>> Thank you.
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>  
>>>> Glen
>>>>  
>>>> 
>>>> Please consult the Wiki agenda for the latest updates:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+10+May+2012
>>>> 
>>>> The motions before Council are posted on page:
>>>> https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+10+May+2012
>>>> 
>>>> Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 10 May 2012
>>>> This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating 
>>>> Procedures approved 22 September 2011 for the GNSO Council and updated.
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-16dec11-en.pdf
>>>> For convenience:
>>>> An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided 
>>>> in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
>>>> An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee 
>>>> voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
>>>> Meeting Times 15:00 UTC
>>>> Coordinated Universal Time 15:00 UTC
>>>> 08:00 Los Angeles; 11:00 Washington; 16:00 London; 17:00 Paris; 00:00 Tokyo
>>>> Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors 
>>>> should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
>>>> GNSO Council meeting audiocast
>>>> http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
>>>> Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)
>>>> 1.1 Roll Call
>>>> 1.2 Statement of interest updates
>>>> 1.3 Review/amend agenda
>>>> 1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the 
>>>> GNSO Operating Procedures:
>>>> Draft Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 12 April 2012
>>>> To be approved on 30 April 
>>>> 2012.http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg12945.html
>>>> 1.5. GNSO Pending Projects List
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-projects-list.pdf
>>>> Review main changes.
>>>> Comments and/or questions.
>>>> Item 2: Consent agenda (5 minutes)
>>>> A consent agenda item is being added as a standard agenda item to provide 
>>>> for a simplified process to obtain Council approval on specific tasks.
>>>> Item 3: Best practices for addressing abusive registrations (10 minutes)
>>>> Following the recommendation of the Registration Abuse Policies (RAP) 
>>>> Working Group, the GNSO Council requested a discussion paper on the 
>>>> creation of non-binding best practices to help registrars and registries 
>>>> address the abusive registrations of domain names.
>>>> The discussion paper recommended the creation of two Working Groups, one 
>>>> to establish the framework for best practices and one to propose candidate 
>>>> best practices to address the abusive registration of domain names.
>>>> The Council must now consider a motion to set up a drafting team to create 
>>>> the charter for these groups.
>>>> Refer to motion 
>>>> 1[https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+10+May+2012
>>>> ]
>>>> 3.2   Reading of the motion (Zahid Jamil)
>>>> 3.3   Discussion
>>>> 3.3   Vote
>>>> Item 4: Update on the new PDP (10 minutes)
>>>>  
>>>> In December 2011, the ICANN Board adopted, on the recommendation of the 
>>>> GNSO Council, the revised GNSO Policy Development Process. This session is 
>>>> to introduce the revised GNSO PDP and explain its new features in detail.
>>>> Introduction to Revised Policy Development Process (PDP)
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/intro-revised-gnso-pdp-14mar12-en.pdf
>>>> 4.1 Update (Marika Konings)
>>>> 4.2 Discussion
>>>>  
>>>> Item 5: International Olympics Committee /Red Cross Names Drafting Team 
>>>> (IOC/RC DT) (10 minutes)
>>>> At its March 26 meeting, the GNSO Council approved the IOC/RC DT's 
>>>> recommendations (see resolution passed by the Council here 
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions#20120326-1).
>>>> On April 10, 2012, the Board established the New gTLD Program Committee 
>>>> and granted it all of the powers of the Board to exercise Board-level 
>>>> authority for any and all issues that may arise relating to the New gTLD 
>>>> Program. The Committee met on 10 April 2012 and resolved not to update the 
>>>> New gTLD Applicant Guidebook at this time (see 
>>>> http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/prelim-report-new-gtld-10apr12-en.htm).
>>>> In the light of this Board decision, this discussion item aims to 
>>>> determine whether the Council should disband the IOC/RC DT or whether 
>>>> fresh instructions should be given to the DT.
>>>> 5.1 DT Update from Staff (X Y).
>>>> 5.2 Discussion
>>>> 5.3 Next Steps
>>>> Item 6: Update on the Joint Supporting Organisations/Advisory Committee on 
>>>> New gTLD Applicant Support Working Group( JAS WG) (10 minutes)
>>>>  
>>>> This item aims to provide the Council with a status update on the JAS WG 
>>>> so that next steps for the group can be determined.
>>>> 6.1 WG update from Staff (Kurt Pritz)
>>>> 6.2 Discussion
>>>> 6.3 Next steps
>>>> Item 7: Synthesis of WHOIS Service Requirements - The WHOIS Access 
>>>> recommendation (10 minutes)
>>>> The WHOIS access recommendation was considered as part of the consent 
>>>> agenda at the Council's 16 February 2012 meeting.
>>>> At that meeting, the ISP constituency requested that the proposal to end 
>>>> this work be removed from the consent agenda and considered as part of the 
>>>> GNSO's main agenda. A further suggestion was suggested that 
>>>> constituency/stakeholder members work with Staff to identify a path 
>>>> forward and that the topic be further discussed at the Costa Rica meetings.
>>>> This agenda item is to determine what next steps, if any, should be 
>>>> planned for this project item.
>>>> 7.1 Update from Staff (X Y)
>>>> 7.2 Discussion
>>>> 7.3 Next steps
>>>>  
>>>> Item 8: Update on the Internationalised Registration Data WG (10 minutes)
>>>> The IRD submitted its final report to the GNSO Council and SSAC on March 
>>>> 3, 2012 for review and approval.
>>>> However, SSAC has recommend some substantial changes and more work may now 
>>>> be needed by the IRD before its final report can be considered.
>>>> This agenda item is to provide an update on these latest developments in 
>>>> the IRD WG's work to the Council.
>>>> 8.1 WG update from Staff (Steve Cheng)
>>>> 8.2 Discussion
>>>> 
>>>> Item 9:  Any Other Business (5 minutes)
>>>> Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, 
>>>> Section 3)
>>>> 9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the 
>>>> GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council 
>>>> motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each 
>>>> House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following 
>>>> GNSO actions:
>>>> a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 
>>>> one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
>>>> b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as 
>>>> described in Annex A): requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third 
>>>> (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
>>>> c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO 
>>>> Supermajority.
>>>> d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an 
>>>> affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than 
>>>> two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
>>>> e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an 
>>>> affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
>>>> f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter 
>>>> approved under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment 
>>>> to the Charter through a simple majority vote of each House.
>>>> g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a 
>>>> Final Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant 
>>>> cause, upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor 
>>>> of termination.
>>>> h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
>>>> affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one 
>>>> GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder 
>>>> Groups supports the Recommendation.
>>>> i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
>>>> affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
>>>> j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain 
>>>> Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a 
>>>> two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, 
>>>> the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
>>>> k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by 
>>>> the ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended 
>>>> by the GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
>>>> l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council 
>>>> members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a 
>>>> majority of the other House."
>>>> Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 4.4)
>>>> 4.4.1 Applicability
>>>> Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council 
>>>> motions or measures.
>>>> a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
>>>> b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
>>>> c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN 
>>>> Bylaws;
>>>> d. Fill a Council position open for election.
>>>> 4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the 
>>>> announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting‟s 
>>>> adjournment. In exceptional circumstances,announced at the time of the 
>>>> vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 
>>>> calendar days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all 
>>>> Vice-Chairs present.
>>>> 4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee 
>>>> votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for 
>>>> transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include 
>>>> voting by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies 
>>>> as may become available.
>>>> 4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must 
>>>> be a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 15:00
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> California, USA (PDT) UTC-8+1DST 08:00
>>>> New York/Washington DC, USA (EDT) UTC-5+1DST 11:00
>>>> Buenos Aires, Argentina (ART) UTC-3+0DST 12:00
>>>> Montevideo, Uruguay (UYT) UTC-3+0DST 12:00
>>>> London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+1DST 16:00
>>>> Abuja,Nigeria (WAT) UTC+1+0DST 16:00
>>>> Tunis, Tunisia (CET) UTC+1+0DST 16:00
>>>> Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 17:00
>>>> Paris, France (CEST) UTC+1+1DST 17:00
>>>> Ramat Hasharon, Israel(IST) UTC+2+0DST 18:00
>>>> Karachi, Pakistan (PKT ) UTC+5+0DST 20:00
>>>> Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 23:00
>>>> Tokyo, Japan (JST) UTC+9+0DST 00:00
>>>> Wellington, New Zealand (NZDT ) UTC+12+0DST 03:00
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2012, 2:00 or 3:00 local 
>>>> time (with exceptions)
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>>  
>>>> Glen de Saint Géry
>>>> GNSO Secretariat
>>>> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> http://gnso.icann.org
>>>>  
>>> 
>> 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Thomas Rickert, Rechtsanwalt
> Schollmeyer &  Rickert Rechtsanwaltsgesellschaft m.b.H. (i.e. law firm)
> Geschäftsführer / CEO: Torsten Schollmeyer, Thomas Rickert
> HRB 9262, AG Bonn
> 
> Büro / Office Bonn:
> Kaiserplatz 7-9, 53113 Bonn, Germany
> Phone: +49 (0)228 74 898 - 0
> 
> Büro / Office Frankfurt a.M.:
> Savignystraße 43, 60325 Frankfurt, Germany
> Phone: +49 (0)69 714 021 - 56
> 
> Zentralfax: +49 (0)228 74 898 - 66
> 
> mailto: rickert@xxxxxxxxxxx
> skype-id: trickert
> web: www.anwaelte.de
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>