ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Fwd: DRAFT text for Board Comment

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: DRAFT text for Board Comment
  • From: <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 15:51:17 -0400
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The new suggested sentence -

To the extent that the GAC provides policy advice to the Board on this matter, 
the GNSO looks forward to reviewing the policy implications of such advice, in 
accordance with its role within the organizational framework of ICANN.

Sent from a mobile device; please excuse brevity and any grammatical or 
typographical errors.

"Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>" 
<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:



Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT

Début du message réexpédié :

> De : <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : DRAFT text for Board Comment
> Date : 15 mars 2012 13:30:11 UTC-06:00
> À : "Stéphane_Van_Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> The GNSO Council was asked this week by the board to work with the Government 
> Advisory Committee to provide policy advice in response to a December 13 
> letter from Intergovernmental Organizations legal counsel seeking provision 
> for a targeted exclusion of third party registrations of the names and 
> acronyms of IGOs both at the top and second level, at least during ICANN?s 
> first application round of new gTLDs.
>  
> The timing of the application process does not allow adequate time for the 
> GNSO Council to address this matter.
>  
> It is an issue, though, that needs to be addressed for future rounds, at both 
> the first and second levels.  But, as the legal counsel represent 
> Intergovernmental Organizations, the focus first needs to rightly be on them 
> working with the GAC to provide advice to the Board.  The Board can, as is 
> explicit in the organizational design of ICANN, then ask the GNSO Council to 
> deal with the policy implications.
>  
> In the near term, the Council will re-visit a motion on providing top tier 
> considerations for the IOC and Red Cross to meet the deadline of the first 
> round of the new gTLDs.






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>