ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] DRAFT text for Board Comment

  • To: "<Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>" <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] DRAFT text for Board Comment
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 14:24:46 -0600
  • Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <4F620FFE0200005B00087859@smtp.law.unh.edu>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <4F620FFE0200005B00087859@smtp.law.unh.edu>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Thanks Mary. Here is the revised version.

Attachment: GNSO response to the Board v2.docx
Description: Microsoft Office


Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT

Le 15 mars 2012 à 13:51, <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> <Mary.Wong@xxxxxxxxxxx> a 
écrit :

> 
> The new suggested sentence -
> 
> To the extent that the GAC provides policy advice to the Board on this 
> matter, the GNSO looks forward to reviewing the policy implications of such 
> advice, in accordance with its role within the organizational framework of 
> ICANN.
> 
> Sent from a mobile device; please excuse brevity and any grammatical or 
> typographical errors.
> 
> "Stéphane Van Gelder<stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>" 
> <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> Directeur Général / General manager
> INDOM Group NBT France
> ----------------
> Head of Domain Operations
> Group NBT
> 
> Début du message réexpédié :
> 
>> De : <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Objet : DRAFT text for Board Comment
>> Date : 15 mars 2012 13:30:11 UTC-06:00
>> À : "Stéphane_Van_Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> The GNSO Council was asked this week by the board to work with the 
>> Government Advisory Committee to provide policy advice in response to a 
>> December 13 letter from Intergovernmental Organizations legal counsel 
>> seeking provision for a targeted exclusion of third party registrations of 
>> the names and acronyms of IGOs both at the top and second level, at least 
>> during ICANN’s first application round of new gTLDs.
>> 
>> The timing of the application process does not allow adequate time for the 
>> GNSO Council to address this matter.
>> 
>> It is an issue, though, that needs to be addressed for future rounds, at 
>> both the first and second levels.  But, as the legal counsel represent 
>> Intergovernmental Organizations, the focus first needs to rightly be on them 
>> working with the GAC to provide advice to the Board.  The Board can, as is 
>> explicit in the organizational design of ICANN, then ask the GNSO Council to 
>> deal with the policy implications.
>> 
>> In the near term, the Council will re-visit a motion on providing top tier 
>> considerations for the IOC and Red Cross to meet the deadline of the first 
>> round of the new gTLDs.
> 
> 
> 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>