ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Communication of the output of CWGs / Future of CWGs

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Communication of the output of CWGs / Future of CWGs
  • From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:42:33 -0600
  • Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac0C4y8RxjyivUUdTDKIPE0aR33wYA==

Hi Stéphane,

 

Suggested covering letter for other SO / AC?s on the work of the CWG DT.

 

Jonathan

 

 

Dear Colleagues,

 

You may be aware that over the course of last year the GNSO Council formed
and operated a drafting team to examine the issues associated with the
formation and operation of Community / Cross-Community working groups.

 

The output of the drafting team was encapsulated in a set of draft
principles which were accepted by the Council through a motion passed at the
14 March 2012 meeting of the GNSO Council.  

 

The motion is linked to here:

 

 
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+14+March+20
12>
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+14+March+201
2

 

The draft principles are linked to here:

 

 <http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf>
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf

 

It is important to note here that work undertaken by the drafting team was
undertaken specifically in order to develop a GNSO Council agreed
perspective.

The output shared here is not in any way intended to presume that this is a
broader, community agreed position.  

 

Accordingly we are offering this work as input into the discussion which you
may wish to initiate or further develop within your organisation or
committee.

 

Regards,

 

 

Stéphane

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>