<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Communication of the output of CWGs / Future of CWGs
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Communication of the output of CWGs / Future of CWGs
- From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:42:33 -0600
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac0C4y8RxjyivUUdTDKIPE0aR33wYA==
Hi Stéphane,
Suggested covering letter for other SO / AC?s on the work of the CWG DT.
Jonathan
Dear Colleagues,
You may be aware that over the course of last year the GNSO Council formed
and operated a drafting team to examine the issues associated with the
formation and operation of Community / Cross-Community working groups.
The output of the drafting team was encapsulated in a set of draft
principles which were accepted by the Council through a motion passed at the
14 March 2012 meeting of the GNSO Council.
The motion is linked to here:
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+14+March+20
12>
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+14+March+201
2
The draft principles are linked to here:
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf>
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/draft-principles-for-cwgs-23dec11-en.pdf
It is important to note here that work undertaken by the drafting team was
undertaken specifically in order to develop a GNSO Council agreed
perspective.
The output shared here is not in any way intended to presume that this is a
broader, community agreed position.
Accordingly we are offering this work as input into the discussion which you
may wish to initiate or further develop within your organisation or
committee.
Regards,
Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|