<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Fwd: DRAFT text for Board Comment
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Fwd: DRAFT text for Board Comment
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:36:50 -0600
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <20120315123011.a9a203d782c20324abd21efa41e2a5a6.066758d60c.wbe@email14.secureserver.net>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stéphane Van Gelder
Directeur Général / General manager
INDOM Group NBT France
----------------
Head of Domain Operations
Group NBT
Début du message réexpédié :
> De : <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Objet : DRAFT text for Board Comment
> Date : 15 mars 2012 13:30:11 UTC-06:00
> À : "Stéphane_Van_Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> The GNSO Council was asked this week by the board to work with the Government
> Advisory Committee to provide policy advice in response to a December 13
> letter from Intergovernmental Organizations legal counsel seeking provision
> for a targeted exclusion of third party registrations of the names and
> acronyms of IGOs both at the top and second level, at least during ICANN’s
> first application round of new gTLDs.
>
> The timing of the application process does not allow adequate time for the
> GNSO Council to address this matter.
>
> It is an issue, though, that needs to be addressed for future rounds, at both
> the first and second levels. But, as the legal counsel represent
> Intergovernmental Organizations, the focus first needs to rightly be on them
> working with the GAC to provide advice to the Board. The Board can, as is
> explicit in the organizational design of ICANN, then ask the GNSO Council to
> deal with the policy implications.
>
> In the near term, the Council will re-visit a motion on providing top tier
> considerations for the IOC and Red Cross to meet the deadline of the first
> round of the new gTLDs.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|