[council] RE: Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for amendments to sTLD charters?

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

Thanks, Jeff.  I didn't realize that the linked paper was in response to the 
BGC report footnote. Perhaps it was seeing it in the new gTLD context when the 
BGC rec specifically referred to existing gTLDs?  In any event, I do remember 
it.  I don't remember discussing it in SF, though.  (I'm sure you raised it; I 
just don't remember it.)

Would someone from policy staff please let us know that the current status of 
this paper is?  Still discussion draft?

Thanks.

K

________________________________
From: Neuman, Jeff [mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 6:05 PM
To: Rosette, Kristina; 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for amendments to 
sTLD charters?

Kristina,

A paper was posted on February 21, 2011 
(http://www.icann.org/en/topics/new-gtlds/explantory-memo-community-change-request-21feb11-en.pdf);
 which was heavily objected to on a number of grounds by the RySG.  In our 
view, there were a number of flawed assumptions in there as well as too heavy a 
hand by ICANN.

I am not sure if someone from staff forwarded this to you, so I thought I would 
and send it to the Council.  At a few of the meetings, I brought this up at the 
council level (in San Francisco in particular), but the Council did not seem 
interested in taking it up at the time (or maybe they weren't paying attention 
:))

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy


________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:48 AM
To: 'council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [council] Did we receive a briefing paper on the process for 
amendments to sTLD charters?


All,

I was just reading the BGC's December 9, 2010 recommendation on the .jobs 
Charter Compliance Coalition reconsideration request and came across this 
footnote on page 12:


4 The BGC also thinks that the Board should address the need for a process to 
evaluate amendments that may have the effect of changing, or seeking to change, 
an sTLD Charter or Stated Purpose of a sponsored, restricted or community-based 
TLD. Because such a process may impact gTLDs greatly and is a policy issue, the 
GNSO is the natural starting point for evaluating such a process. We therefore 
further recommend that the Board direct the CEO to create a briefing paper for 
the GNSO to consider on this matter, and for the GNSO to determine whether a 
policy development process should be commenced.

I don't recall receiving any such briefing paper.  Did we receive one?  If so, 
would the relevant staff person mind sending me a copy of it?  Thanks!

K