<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Draft message to the Board
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Draft message to the Board
- From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 20:14:52 -0400
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <779E4503-2EA4-46AC-AE0F-4C71BA2BA24F@indom.com> <BANLkTi=b_PJANWSu6iTMYh8OO7uvB8vpAw@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB569F8C4F52@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <BANLkTik1fr0XMqFzabH1pJCf311D7uhqyQ@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB569F8C4F53@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <BANLkTimDYex9Gps=VuHNYdOSiOetfR87Ew@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB569F8C4F64@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <BANLkTikdFj6rc+UhrOGfr6V2fg6AMrVHCA@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB569F8C4F6A@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <BANLkTi=-+SCem+xh-ea7OKJSFEZ5Z6LxHQ@mail.gmail.com> <1670166692-1305070091-cardhu_blackberry.rim.net-copy_sent_folder-276747266-@bda959.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To be clear, the report initially went from Rafik
to the ALAC and GNSO Chairs and to GNSO/ALAC
staff only. A second copy in PDF format was sent
to the same recipients (plus ALAC Executive Committee) by Carlton a bit later.
Neither of these versions had the cover page or
Summary on it that you see in the final version
that Stéphane forwarded to the GNSO. Those
sections were added by Olivier to make it more
presentable. The cover sheet says "This Report is
submitted for consideration to the ICANN Board
and ICANN community." and the Summary says "This
report is submitted to the Board and is currently
undergoing ALAC ratification." Both of those
statements are accurate, as a report that was at
that time coming from the ALAC.
To correct another misunderstanding, the report
came to the ALAC and GNSO chairs at the same
time. The ALAC had decided at its last meeting to
submit it to the Board prior to review in order
to make the document cut-off for the Board
retreat, with the understanding that the ALAC
*would* be reviewing it and commenting
(potentially positively or negatively) well before the Board retreat.
The procedure was explained by e-mail from
Olivier to Stéphane prior to taking place and
this explanation was forwarded to the GNSO
Council list -
http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg11229.html.
Alan
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|