ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Draft message to the Board

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Draft message to the Board
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:08:38 -0700
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=u9+q/7iDbLZln5w879fo1BEXcdJaQ4024HkGxsEuIiA=; b=BxnozIqIhpaymsYnngWez8byr7WiGjOi9kcAzAuqpb329+LE+EJHy3aUR4jJsl0Xa1 4Dp7z+11lt5KLGeHs1H1/Ffh4osh3TQS8YwoE/gwJq1NI1l9ZqgurYE80pJqXMQPql/Y ghDfvTpSt4jXjVan1tKO3zyvCOZjsCdnxDugc=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=V28OzvKg1C6EPWkHVMnB+hDEZLcKalqYjyb4iolC1ENfAxl8aiX3IoHTnpsZNpLgna 8J40EyJFLPdN5sn2NQVxQ18PxOPGxpNp3RtFy4E5nBfmrOmc21iDiLSQv70efu4Q5kjC wN0YADMohTmMzHaFPN4QA0ixJoEe1R5e80j0I=
  • In-reply-to: <779E4503-2EA4-46AC-AE0F-4C71BA2BA24F@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <779E4503-2EA4-46AC-AE0F-4C71BA2BA24F@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Stéphane,
my apologies if I missed some emails, I was travelling.
Could you please clarify "unanimous support"?
Many thanks and regards
Olga

2011/5/10 Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>

> Councillors,
>
> In response to Adrian's suggestion, which so far has met with unanimous
> support, I have drafted this short email to the Board. Please let me have
> your thoughts and any suggested edits. Rafik, as JAS WG co-chair and Council
> liaison, I think it is crucial that we have your input before sending any
> message to the Board.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
> Dear Peter,
>
> On May 10, the Board was sent the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support
> Working Group ( JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report by ALAC. We understand
> that this report has not yet been approved by ALAC.
>
> The GNSO Council wishes to highlight the fact that it has not approved this
> report yet either. In fact, the Council has only just received it. The
> report was sent to us by the co-chairs of the JAS working group on May 9,
> 2011.
>
> As one of the two chartering organisations of the JAS WG, the GNSO is keen
> to ensure that the Board understands the nature of the report that it has
> been sent, and the circumstances under which it received it.
>
> I would be grateful therefore, if you could convey the GNSO Council's
> message to the Board.
>
> Best,
>
> Stéphane Van Gelder
> GNSO Council Chair
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>