<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Draft message to the Board
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Draft message to the Board
- From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:23:12 -0700
- Cc: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QnZ/SrRKKm94Ihcv8lPiQ0EdXXAReIEBrslGxVUSCQc=; b=tL29zZaN0K9FjiJ1sLld5tS8X0hpk8mLtKY1jfZntaFOwaBwGYJbKz0foGHvUYVXO7 kRYIc7onC1jcF7QfrEXPoI0pBmsxPFcN3pDe/yZOV+TJTh14WlXMPnjic2zAYw4ftxBx i8mLQamfGbSGo7uaEVL3pqBGIIhflbBzSdSOI=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZK5LBS1dQEgroZ6106e0ZGxf8af/xZ2Mz54Po3cx11dGzIccR9R/xlpVMijoPdcw/y 8XPgRKsXtyXhw7PIfJPBSrmJFweRHKfPzm51TjrFXQm7OhP+IArJonOjm3yzmCN6RiaF MPXitlBpmUroNksvYHuT0EmuLzsNK/otDg6RM=
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB569F8C4F52@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <779E4503-2EA4-46AC-AE0F-4C71BA2BA24F@indom.com> <BANLkTi=b_PJANWSu6iTMYh8OO7uvB8vpAw@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB569F8C4F52@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
Should we have a vote on this?
I do not understand why we have to rush, could some one clarify this to me?
Best
Olga
2011/5/10 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Olga,
>
>
>
> Maybe I can help, I believe SVG means that, of all the responses to the
> list so far, all have agreed with my statement and request to send a letter
> to the Board.
>
>
>
> *Adrian Kinderis*
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 10 May 2011 3:09 PM
> *To:* Stéphane Van Gelder
>
> *Cc:* council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> *Subject:* Re: [council] Draft message to the Board
>
>
>
> Hi Stéphane,
> my apologies if I missed some emails, I was travelling.
> Could you please clarify "unanimous support"?
> Many thanks and regards
> Olga
>
> 2011/5/10 Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Councillors,
>
>
>
> In response to Adrian's suggestion, which so far has met with unanimous
> support, I have drafted this short email to the Board. Please let me have
> your thoughts and any suggested edits. Rafik, as JAS WG co-chair and Council
> liaison, I think it is crucial that we have your input before sending any
> message to the Board.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Stéphane
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Dear Peter,
>
>
>
> On May 10, the Board was sent the Joint SO/AC New gTLD Applicant Support
> Working Group ( JAS WG)'s Second Milestone Report by ALAC. We understand
> that this report has not yet been approved by ALAC.
>
>
>
> The GNSO Council wishes to highlight the fact that it has not approved this
> report yet either. In fact, the Council has only just received it. The
> report was sent to us by the co-chairs of the JAS working group on May 9,
> 2011.
>
>
>
> As one of the two chartering organisations of the JAS WG, the GNSO is keen
> to ensure that the Board understands the nature of the report that it has
> been sent, and the circumstances under which it received it.
>
>
>
> I would be grateful therefore, if you could convey the GNSO Council's
> message to the Board.
>
>
>
> Best,
>
>
>
> Stéphane Van Gelder
>
> GNSO Council Chair
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|