RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and Cross Working Groups

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I think what Jeff lays out pretty much expresses the issues I see. I
think such groups may be useful in "contributing" to certain policy work
and may be useful in performing other non-policy related work. 


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development
> work and Cross Working Groups
> From: carlos dionisio aguirre <carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, March 09, 2011 9:45 am
> To: <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Yes Tim, I know. The idea was to show another side of the same reality. I 
> believe we can think on this, waht do you think about it ? .  Thank`s.
> 
> Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> former ALAC member by LACRALO
> Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> http://ar.ageiadensi.org 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: tim@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To: carlosaguirre62@xxxxxxxxxxx
> CC: jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and 
> Cross Working Groups
> Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 08:41:58 -0700
> 
> I don't disagree with your thoughts Carlos, but those concerns should
> have been focused toward the PPSC Work Team on improving the policy
> development process. 
> 
> Tim
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: RE: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development
> > work and Cross Working Groups
> > From: carlos dionisio aguirre 
> > Date: Wed, March 09, 2011 9:17 am
> > To: , 
> > 
> > 
> > Dear Councillors: I fully Agree with jeff on this point and the 
> > importance to talk deeply about it, does not mean that I agreed with the
> >  document but yes with the subject. In my point of view we need a kind 
> > of regulation on this matter to improve the great work of this groups, 
> > wich give us the possibilty to get different points of view coming from 
> > different positions making reality the bottom up process, the 
> > participation and diversity. But, also, I believe that is needed to 
> > clarify how it must functioning and how they get their conclusions in 
> > order to avoid useless differences.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Carlos Dionisio Aguirre
> > NCA GNSO Council - ICANN
> > former ALAC member by LACRALO
> > Abogado - Especialista en Derecho de los Negocios
> > Sarmiento 71 - 4to. 18 Cordoba - Argentina -
> > *54-351-424-2123 / 423-5423
> > http://ar.ageiadensi.org 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > From: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx
> > > To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 09:07:44 -0500
> > > Subject: [council] Discussion of Cross-SO/AC policy development work and 
> > > Cross Working Groups
> > > 
> > > 
> > > With permission from the Business Constituency, I wanted to point you all 
> > > to a document posted on the BC list at 
> > > http://forum.icann.org/lists/bc-gnso/pdf6peymFRFtB.pdf  regarding Cross 
> > > SO/AC issues. Without commenting on whether I agree with all of the 
> > > substance, I personally believe this document touches on all of the areas 
> > > we should be thinking about.  As you know, this subject will be up for 
> > > discussion over the weekend with the council and community, and I think 
> > > these questions are ones we should all be asking ourselves about CWGs in 
> > > the future. I am not sure who is leading that discussion, but this 
> > > document could sure help us move this along.
> > > 
> > > Thanks.
> > >  
> > > Jeffrey J. Neuman 
> > > Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
> > > 46000 Center Oak Plaza Sterling, VA 20166
> > > Office: +1.571.434.5772  Mobile: +1.202.549.5079  Fax: +1.703.738.7965 / 
> > > jeff.neuman@xxxxxxxxxxx  / www.neustar.biz      
> > > 
> > > The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the 
> > > use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or 
> > > privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have 
> > > received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, 
> > > distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you 
> > > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately 
> > > and delete the original message.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> >                                       
> > 
> 
>                                         
>