RE: [council] GNSO SF schedule

["Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>]

To the Contrary, I believe that the Council as a whole (as opposed to any 
working group - since there is none) should discuss any outstanding issues 
involving Registration Abuse and follow up items from ICANN staff including the 
Letters, Issue Report (on UDRP Review) and Discussion Paper (Registry/Registrar 
Best Practices) as requested by the Council on Feb 3rd.


Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy

________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: Olga Cavalli [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:49 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff
Cc: Julie Hedlund; GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule

Jeff,
Many thanks for your comments.

Could you please clarify to me:

"There is no RAP working group anymore, so any discussions on the resolutions 
passed by Council at the meeting earlier this month need to be had as a full 
Council. "

This means that you suggest we are not having a specific RAP meeting on 
Saturday / Sunday?

If this is the case and my interpretation is correct then, could you clarify:

"In any case, I am opposed to having the PPSC meeting opposite what is now 
labeled as "RAP" and so that issue needs to get discussed."

Apologies if this sounds confusing but I find difficulties in updating the 
schedule following your comments.

Many thanks and regards
Olga



2011/2/22 Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>>
Julie,

Thanks for the explanation.  I cannot speak for the Council, but we should have 
the discussion since there is so much to cover over the weekend.

In any case, I am opposed to having the PPSC meeting opposite what is now 
labeled as "RAP" and so that issue needs to get discussed.

Thanks.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.


From: Julie Hedlund 
[mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:36 AM
To: Neuman, Jeff; Olga Cavalli; GNSO Council

Subject: Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule

Jeff,


With respect to the SSAC meeting, it was my understanding that the GNSO Council 
wanted to meet with Patrik Faltstrom.  As to an agenda, he plans to provide a 
brief presentation on current SSAC activities followed by questions and 
discussion with the Councilors.  I do know that he would very much like to meet 
with the GNSO Council, but when and whether that happens is, of course, up to 
the Council.  He is very interested in encouraging dialog between the SSAC and 
the SOs and other ACs.   If the Council does not wish to meet with him I will 
need to know as soon as possible since I am managing Patrik's schedule.

Thanks,
Julie


On 2/22/11 10:23 AM, "Neuman, Jeff" 
<Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx<http://Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Olga,

Can we get an explanation of what the purpose of the 9-10 meeting with Patrick 
and the SSAC is for?  Is there an agenda?  I know many of the stakeholder 
groups are meeting with them separately, so I am not sure why we need to meet 
with them at a Council level as well.

Also, I am not sure why there are two conflicting meetings from 10:30-12 on 
Saturday (PPSC and RAP).   There is no RAP working group anymore, so any 
discussions on the resolutions passed by Council at the meeting earlier this 
month need to be had as a full Council.   My recommendation would be that we 
move the discussions on the Registration Abuse to 9-10 and if we need to have a 
conflicting meeting, we can have Councilors on the PPSC choose between meeting 
with the SSAC and the PPSC meeting.

Can we also change the Sunday meeting entitled "PPSC" to "PDP-WT"?

Thanks.

Jeffrey J. Neuman
Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy
________________________________
The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the use 
of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or privileged 
information. If you are not the intended recipient you have received this 
e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying 
of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication 
in error, please notify us immediately and delete the original message.



From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<http://owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 6:48 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] GNSO SF schedule


Hi,
attached you can find a new version of the GNSO SF Schedule.
Please note that Saturday 9-10 am there will be a presentation by Patrick 
Falstrom new chair of the SSAC.
There are still some meetings to be confirmed / defined. (marked yellow)
Please let Glen and myself know if all events and changes have been reflected 
in this new version or if you have any suggestion or comment.
Best regards
Olga