ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule

  • To: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 12:49:26 -0300
  • Cc: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=cYoubZUIFIRIGdulmQPe88jgS4knX8uCJ4BUN5ZeeVE=; b=Bc5m/yD5L4rtj4HobXzxNF8Meui6umB823KOoOT9VDoV/i2pn/RQvE54kIIS9AMvvg ax6f2/Rx7JXikA5LvD0+Y6SRAPXU1H4C0M6Mu5FCcbbUa+ZMBqL7Tw1RuCLOm3P8MMzC 9T57QOA/D83VVpSaA6VzBc//AwcTW3e/Ic2Oo=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=whjbbJyp7MvYvbKtjvk8qJIHehDKiBSRSZtzXiFltq0aExxIc+yza/kizDi6DawoZ5 v9DA3/MBjdezduj5bcf1Lr0DjfMc6CFfVPoglwPQrICSf6m3C02CQNOGQd+DHpQVLJJN 4uW1gclh5fIr+m/Zp/0sAOuWizM+C9C514Z9I=
  • In-reply-to: <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA706C22DF2F4@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA706C22DF2E4@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com> <C98941FF.E6B0%julie.hedlund@icann.org> <31582FA079F2AC4FBC8BA78B67C32AA706C22DF2F4@STNTEXCH01.cis.neustar.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Jeff,
Many thanks for your comments.

Could you please clarify to me:

"There is no RAP working group anymore, so any discussions on the
resolutions passed by Council at the meeting earlier this month need to be
had as a full Council. "

This means that you suggest we are not having a specific RAP meeting on
Saturday / Sunday?

If this is the case and my interpretation is correct then, could you
clarify:

"In any case, I am opposed to having the PPSC meeting opposite what is now
labeled as “RAP” and so that issue needs to get discussed."

Apologies if this sounds confusing but I find difficulties in updating the
schedule following your comments.

Many thanks and regards
Olga




2011/2/22 Neuman, Jeff <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>

> Julie,
>
>
>
> Thanks for the explanation.  I cannot speak for the Council, but we should
> have the discussion since there is so much to cover over the weekend.
>
>
>
> In any case, I am opposed to having the PPSC meeting opposite what is now
> labeled as “RAP” and so that issue needs to get discussed.
>
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman**
> **Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy*
>
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Julie Hedlund [mailto:julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 22, 2011 10:36 AM
> *To:* Neuman, Jeff; Olga Cavalli; GNSO Council
>
> *Subject:* Re: [council] GNSO SF schedule
>
>
>
> Jeff,
>
>
> With respect to the SSAC meeting, it was my understanding that the GNSO
> Council wanted to meet with Patrik Faltstrom.  As to an agenda, he plans to
> provide a brief presentation on current SSAC activities followed by
> questions and discussion with the Councilors.  I do know that he would very
> much like to meet with the GNSO Council, but when and whether that happens
> is, of course, up to the Council.  He is very interested in encouraging
> dialog between the SSAC and the SOs and other ACs.   If the Council does not
> wish to meet with him I will need to know as soon as possible since I am
> managing Patrik’s schedule.
>
> Thanks,
> Julie
>
>
> On 2/22/11 10:23 AM, "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Olga,
>
> Can we get an explanation of what the purpose of the 9-10 meeting with
> Patrick and the SSAC is for?  Is there an agenda?  I know many of the
> stakeholder groups are meeting with them separately, so I am not sure why we
> need to meet with them at a Council level as well.
>
> Also, I am not sure why there are two conflicting meetings from 10:30-12 on
> Saturday (PPSC and RAP).   There is no RAP working group anymore, so any
> discussions on the resolutions passed by Council at the meeting earlier this
> month need to be had as a full Council.   My recommendation would be that we
> move the discussions on the Registration Abuse to 9-10 and if we need to
> have a conflicting meeting, we can have Councilors on the PPSC choose
> between meeting with the SSAC and the PPSC meeting.
>
> Can we also change the Sunday meeting entitled “PPSC” to “PDP-WT”?
>
> Thanks.
>
> *Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Law & Policy*
> ------------------------------
>
> The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the
> use of the recipient(s) named above and may contain confidential and/or
> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you have
> received this e-mail message in error and any review, dissemination,
> distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and
> delete the original message.
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]
> *On Behalf Of *Olga Cavalli
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 22, 2011 6:48 AM
> *To:* GNSO Council
> *Subject:* [council] GNSO SF schedule
>
>
> Hi,
> attached you can find a new version of the GNSO SF Schedule.
> Please note that Saturday 9-10 am there will be a presentation by Patrick
> Falstrom new chair of the SSAC.
> There are still some meetings to be confirmed / defined. (marked yellow)
> Please let Glen and myself know if all events and changes have been
> reflected in this new version or if you have any suggestion or comment.
> Best regards
> Olga
>


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>