RE: [council] FW: ALAC Statement on GNSO WG Guidelines
- To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] FW: ALAC Statement on GNSO WG Guidelines
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 06:59:00 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I'm not sure I understand the concerns regarding the involvement of the
ACs. All stakeholders have been invited/permitted to be involved in GNSO
policy WGs since we've been using them with or without guidelines. Is
the ALAC simply encouraging that to continue, or are there specific
concerns that the guidelines are lacking in that regard?
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] FW: ALAC Statement on GNSO WG Guidelines
> From: Glen de Saint GÃ©ry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, February 17, 2011 3:26 am
> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Forwarded From: ICANN At-Large Staff
> Dear GNSO Secretariat,
> On behalf of Olivier Crépin-Leblond, Chair of the ALAC, we have the honor to
> transmit to you the ALAC Statement on the GNSO WG Guidelines.
> We would appreciate if you could forward this Statement to the GNSO Chair and
> Vice-Chairs for consideration at the GNSO Council Meeting scheduled for 24
> February 2011.
> The ALAC welcomes any comments the GNSO Council may wish to make by reply.
> Heidi Ullrich, Matthias Langenegger, Seth Greene, Gisella Gruber-White,
> Marilyn Vernon,
> ICANN At-Large Staff