<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Definitions and measures of competition , consumer trust, and consumer choice
- To: Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Definitions and measures of competition , consumer trust, and consumer choice
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 15:21:41 -0700
- Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Message_id: <20110113152141.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.f8c796cd1f.wbe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Got it. Thanks Bruce.
Tim
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Definitions and measures of competition ,
> consumer trust, and consumer choice
> From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, January 13, 2011 2:57 pm
> To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hello Tim,
>
>
> >> Could you provide the source for the conclusions you make below, or are
> they your own?
>
> Purely my own quick thoughts - none of them need to be accepted in any way :-)
>
>
>
> >> Regarding the
> latter, at some point .com may be less 20% but if a large portion of
> other gTLD registrations are only defensive and mostly point to .coms,
> is that a good sign of competition?
>
> No.
>
> >> Finally, I'm not sure it is a good idea for the regulator's own criteria
> and evaluation to be the only measure of the effectiveness of its
> regulations. So we should consider third party involvement as well.
>
> Agreed. But given we as a community are initiating a project - lets at
> least have some shared measures of our own. Any independent review may wish
> to look at other aspects - but we at least need our own measures to manage
> our own projects.
>
> Regards,
> Bruce
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|