RE: SPAM-LOW: RE: [council] Definitions and measures of competition , consumer trust, and consumer choice

["Rosemary Sinclair" <Rosemary.Sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Bruce

 

I wonder if you would have time for a chat by phone next Tuesday (my
preference.....)? I'm out of Sydney until Monday evening.....

 

I'd like to explore some feedback from the GNSO Council call this
morning about the resource implications of the CCC work and what the
options might be?

 

Let me know what time works for you and I'll work around that!

 

Cheers

 

Rosemary

 

Rosemary Sinclair

Managing Director, ATUG

Chairman, INTUG

T: +61 2 94958901  F: +61 2 94193889

M: +61 413734490 

Email: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

Skype: rasinclair

 

Please visit the ATUG website for Updates and Information
www.atug.com.au 

 

________________________________

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
Sent: Friday, 14 January 2011 10:15 AM
To: Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [!! SPAM] SPAM-LOW: RE: [council] Definitions and measures of
competition , consumer trust, and consumer choice

 

Got it. Thanks Bruce.


Tim

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Definitions and measures of competition ,
> consumer trust, and consumer choice
> From: "Bruce Tonkin" 
> Date: Thu, January 13, 2011 2:57 pm
> To: "Tim Ruiz" 
> Cc: 
> 
> Hello Tim,
> 
> 
> >> Could you provide the source for the conclusions you make below, or
are
> they your own? 
> 
> Purely my own quick thoughts - none of them need to be accepted in any
way :-)
> 
> 
> 
> >> Regarding the
> latter, at some point .com may be less 20% but if a large portion of
> other gTLD registrations are only defensive and mostly point to .coms,
> is that a good sign of competition?
> 
> No.
> 
> >> Finally, I'm not sure it is a good idea for the regulator's own
criteria
> and evaluation to be the only measure of the effectiveness of its
> regulations. So we should consider third party involvement as well.
> 
> Agreed. But given we as a community are initiating a project - lets at
least have some shared measures of our own. Any independent review may
wish to look at other aspects - but we at least need our own measures to
manage our own projects.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce