<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] amendments to original JAS motion
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] amendments to original JAS motion
- From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:46:56 +0900
- Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=9cTxgk61+PzGn9awLR9hfQYTkTTGhMKf42FV7f+9IOg=; b=vPls66oTZIbeGwUbVAknfrB9prLpPDRCdVc8TZxmIhT7G22Qm1AuG+UGPHUJbdHO/N JaLkeLQfSIuMFoOFhn7+y1BCPGzthX8a4/3eNZNAGOeyujbYYQLApi3ZYzSxRyONId7I LHc+zYT/6d20IEh5CZpFZazhXaxEtL5aREmUk=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=FvKCJHc/BXLiBJm8nKJ6nD6I3XKgSUAJB5jbIjovNOKN3Ryn0wYdE+up+TonC4STbe ZbiZtBPdiulujaRy1r9MsFPICZCn+p5wS+c7bRPgwV0qq4rVBafhUfrDvU5swV74O5D0 TLPaiHZ9sbsQk1N3M+8iUCNwfebwU8GFx1ZHE=
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43EF577A0C@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <AANLkTimqBjNe8NNadZx6ZP-FQS0z5ireV640JcAMe4Ne@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43EF577A0C@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Adrian,
always happy to amuse you and let you enjoying reading motions ... but you
should check more carefully next time, you will find the rationale was to
correct a typo ;)
Rafik
2011/1/7 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> h) is interesting Rafik.
>
>
>
> *Adrian Kinderis*
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM
> *To:* Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry
> *Subject:* [council] amendments to original JAS motion
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the
> original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:
>
>
>
> I would like propose changing:
>
> a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of
> demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a
> method of demonstrating that need."
>
> b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would
> need to be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms,
> e.g. a review committee that could be established operating under the set "
>
>
>
> c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to
> support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in
> objective (a) of this charter amendment.
>
> d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of
> coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g.
> brokering the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the
> relationship) and propose methods for coordinating that assistance.
>
> e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods
>
> f) change "Establish methods" to "Propose methods"
>
> g) change "establish policies and practices" to "propose policies and
> practices"
>
> h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants
> meeting the requirements for assistance."
>
> with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants
> meeting the requirements for assistance."
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Rafik Dammak
>
> Twitter: @rafik
>
> Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|