RE: [council] amendments to original JAS motion

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

h) is interesting Rafik.

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Friday, 7 January 2011 7:44 AM
To: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry
Subject: [council] amendments to original JAS motion

Hello,

I would like to suggest those friendly amendments (as compromise) to the 
original JAS motion proposed by me and seconded by Bill:

I would like propose changing:

a) change "Establish the criteria for financial need and a method of 
demonstrating that need." to "Propose the criteria for financial need and a 
method of demonstrating that need."

b) change "Definition of mechanisms, e.g. a review committee that would need to 
be established operating under the set " to "Propose mechanisms, e.g. a review 
committee that could be established operating under the set "

c) Propose mechanism(s) for revenue income and other asset management to 
support new gTLD applicants who meet the criteria as established in objective 
(a) of this charter amendment.

d) Discuss with Backend Registry Service Providers the extent of of 
coordination, to be given by Backend Registry Service Providers (e.g. brokering 
the relationships, reviewing the operational quality of the relationship) and 
propose methods for coordinating that assistance.

e) change "Discuss and establish methods" to "Discuss and propose" methods

f) change "Establish methods" to  "Propose methods"

g) change "establish policies and practices"  to "propose policies and 
practices"

h) replace "propose a percentage of that fee could be waived for applicants 
meeting the requirements for assistance."
with "propose a percentage of that fee that could be waived for applicants 
meeting the requirements for assistance."

Regards

Rafik Dammak
Twitter: @rafik
Linkedin: http://tn.linkedin.com/in/rafikdammak