ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion

  • To: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 18:39:53 +1100
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <AANLkTin-Q2jj9cDyroYigXWTDD2=-vJSqA9hS1FKEg=T@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <AANLkTinE-A2pJOCVxaotUXovstwHCn8iBMf1m7Q-_ump@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F7E0@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <AANLkTikNq-Gumw07hAGJcBcKoiGqBJ4ezKz4CEYOjvx5@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F975@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <AANLkTin-Q2jj9cDyroYigXWTDD2=-vJSqA9hS1FKEg=T@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcuG7wSsN7Y/eRgBT8CFskxSYnSxoAABLWGQ
  • Thread-topic: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion
Thanks Rafik.

I feel much better about the working group if it is going to work within those 
parameters.

Adrian Kinderis


From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 18 November 2010 6:05 PM
To: Adrian Kinderis
Cc: Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry; Gomes, Chuck
Subject: Re: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion

Hello,

AK>> So will you be proposing for a discount from ICANN? Yes or no? To be 
clear, by discount I mean a reduction in the total application fee paid to 
ICANN. It may be for example, that the applicant pays part of the fee and the 
rest is sourced from another means (foundation etc).


1-  yes fees sourced from another means. the WG need to investigate that area 
and we asked to augment it with more expertise for that reason.

2- yes, we didn't state  exceptions for applicants regarding those 
requirements, assistance or support can be technical (from  various service 
providers etc) or financial ( subsidized from external sources). the WG will 
work  to figure out how this could best be done.

AK>> The applicant will pay for Registry Services but they may be subsidised 
from an external party? Yes or no? Also, these Registry Services will comply 
with all other Registry standards as requested in the AGB? Yes or no?

2- Yes. Yes.

3- translation of material etc but not necessarily by ICANN, again the WG will 
work to figure out how it can be done

AK>> OK
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>