ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion

  • To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion
  • From: Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:05:05 +0900
  • Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=vrczaJ/BKRVqFTEL+nk/bFyYA/AxxcQo3TOTixEuY7E=; b=H1cBEf33ncgD0bOKAQ11wNMsb2+RETsX0Mldp3DLwQyTxeJSdK+2q8BHEDwyDjM9Ak PAWx5F6b424WYEGur+3lydhWCSjRl+1lHBCTBqCeBSrQkXJq1dfQ5ck0hLAZMEXpV0t7 ZdO8kLMxmTr5K7eSyuW8BlVWnEIZWpfe4HC/E=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=TqEPRJZdW6u7JL/OFtnkRemtp3wzGGHaYjBhYmNioD5QIodgClBLIkpLOITgasRVkh VuMxUCAYbF6yectDLk2pbGQs6/P4aNAbOdF0dg4UB/rNb2OwdKySnvYF+qibJ3E/w5aR 9qUGO2QHcIwyLOqe706lEcRyC1D4MbaZu0o3I=
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F975@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <AANLkTinE-A2pJOCVxaotUXovstwHCn8iBMf1m7Q-_ump@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F7E0@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <AANLkTikNq-Gumw07hAGJcBcKoiGqBJ4ezKz4CEYOjvx5@mail.gmail.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB43C309F975@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,


> AK>> So will you be proposing for a discount from ICANN? Yes or no? To be
> clear, by discount I mean a reduction in the total application fee paid to
> ICANN. It may be for example, that the applicant pays part of the fee and
> the rest is sourced from another means (foundation etc).
>
>
>
1-  yes fees sourced from another means. the WG need to investigate that
area and we asked to augment it with more expertise for that reason.

2- yes, we didn't state  exceptions for applicants regarding those
> requirements, assistance or support can be technical (from  various service
> providers etc) or financial ( subsidized from external sources). the WG will
> work  to figure out how this could best be done.
>
>
>
> AK>> The applicant will pay for Registry Services but they may be
> subsidised from an external party? Yes or no? Also, these Registry Services
> will comply with all other Registry standards as requested in the AGB? Yes
> or no?
>
>
2- Yes. Yes.

>
>
> 3- translation of material etc but not necessarily by ICANN, again the WG
> will work to figure out how it can be done
>
>
>
> AK>> OK
>
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>