Re: [council] JAS WG charter extension motion

[Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Adrian,

thank you for your interest,
for clarification, an applicant won't necessary apply or/and have all kind
of support.

1- it respect cost-recovery principle and we will work with the new gTLD
program staff to accommodate that (Chuck amendment).  We will work on topic
of  *external* sources of donors or foundations willing to support
financially applicants.
2- yes, we didn't state  exceptions for applicants regarding those
requirements, assistance or support can be technical (from  various service
providers etc) or financial ( subsidized from external sources). the WG will
work  to figure out how this could best be done.
3- translation of material etc but not necessarily by ICANN, again the WG
will work to figure out how it can be done

as you see the WG will work to explore how things will be done (guidelines)

Regards

Rafik

2010/11/17 Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Rafik,
>
>
>
> I have been reviewing the work of the JAS WG.
>
>
>
> It is all good work that is deserved of our attention.
>
>
>
> However, I have read the various Board resolutions that were the genesis of
> the working. The original notion was developed in order to provide *support
> to applicants.*
>
>
>
> Is it fair to say that, in your mind (or the WG’s for that matter), the
> following will be true given the support regime as you would have it;
>
>
>
> - a new gTLD applicant will have to pay the application fee in its entirety
> but will be subsidized through a foundation or external parties?
>
> - a new gTLD applicant will have to establish a Registry System to full and
> ‘standard’ ICANN compliance but may be subsidized in order to cover the
> costs associated?
>
> - ICANN may provide assistance in preparing the application for those where
> English is not a first language
>
>
>
> Can you clarify this for me so I can take this back to my SG? Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> *Adrian Kinderis*
>
>
>
> *From:* owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> *On Behalf Of *Rafik Dammak
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 11, 2010 3:01 AM
> *To:* Council GNSO; Glen de Saint Géry; Gomes, Chuck
> *Subject:* [council] JAS WG charter extension motion
>
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
>
> I want to submit this motion for JAS WG charter extension in response to
> ICANN board resolution about supporting applicants and for completion a list
> of further work items.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> Rafik
>
>
>
>
>
>
>