<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Board review of Papers
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Board review of Papers
- From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 02:33:52 +1100
- Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
- Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: ActmNQuYQnTYVQEARWmT8itTc0MQeg==
- Thread-topic: Board review of Papers
I won't ask this question Chuck but it may pay to get it answered.
How much time would the Board like to have papers prior to meetings/ retreats
etc in order to ensure they are appropriately considered?
It seems to be horribly inefficient to do all the work and not have it
considered at the time.
Adrian Kinderis
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|