ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Board review of Papers

  • To: "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Board review of Papers
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 14:25:42 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A146305@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A146305@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: ActmNQuYQnTYVQEARWmT8itTc0MQegAFyOnA
  • Thread-topic: [council] Board review of Papers

My understanding is that the need the information at least 11 days in
advance of meetings.




From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 11:34 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Board review of Papers


I won't ask this question Chuck but it may pay to get it answered.


How much time would the Board like to have papers prior to meetings/
retreats etc in order to ensure they are appropriately considered?


It seems to be horribly inefficient to do all the work and not have it
considered at the time.


Adrian Kinderis


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>