ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: Adrian Kinderis - SOI (nee DOI)

  • To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] RE: Adrian Kinderis - SOI (nee DOI)
  • From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:36:52 +0200
  • Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A1462FD@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A1462FB@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A1462FD@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi Adrian

On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

> Hells Bells.
>  
> Sorry folks. That is my Declaration of Interest.
>  
> I believe it holds true for the upcoming meeting as most topics are on new 
> gTLD’s.
>  
> P.S. What is the point of all this? How would a DOI differ on a meeting to 
> meeting basis from a SOI?

5.1 says an SOI pertains to "the Relevant Party's judgment, any matters to be 
considered by the GNSO Group" [sic], whereas a DOI pertains to "the Relevant 
Party's judgment on a specific issue,"  which presumably does not fall within 
the scope of "any matters"…(?)

> What is the penalty should I not do a DOI?

5.6 Failure to Comply only addresses an SOI, which is to be provided "prior to 
the start of a GNSO meeting"…(?)

Probably I'm missing something, but in retrospect the language may have merited 
more discussion prior to approving the motion…

Best,

Bill

> 
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:40 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Adrian Kinderis - SOI
>  
> Adrian Kinderis - Registrar Constituency
>  
> I am Chief Executive Officer of AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd a company based in 
> Melbourne, Australia and an ICANN accredited Registrar and member of the 
> Registrar Constituency.
> The AusRegistry Group of companies includes;
> 
> - AusRegistry Pty Ltd which is
> ·        the Registry Services provider for all second level .au domain names
>  
> - AusRegistry International Pty Ltd which is
> ·        a Registry Consultancy Service
> ·        a Registry Software and infrastructure provider for ccTLD’s 
> (including IDN ccTLD’s)
> ·        a Registry Software and infrastructure provider around new gTLD’s 
> (including IDN gTLD’s)
> ·        AusRegistry International currently has no plans to apply for any 
> new gTLD’s as a gTLD applicant (In other words there is no real change to our 
> underlying business model - of providing technology services for Domain Name 
> Registries and Registration)
>  
> I hold the position of Director in all companies above.
>  
> None of the companies within the AusRegistry Group are affiliated with any 
> current gTLD Registry operator with the exception of AusRegistry Pty Ltd of 
> which Afilias has a minority shareholding.
> I am not in possession of any gTLD Registry proprietary or sensitive 
> information, nor have I ever been. I am not an officer, director, consultant, 
> or employee of any other member of this Constituency or any other ICANN 
> Constituency. I like to collect butterflies.
>  
>  
> Adrian Kinderis
> 
>  

***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
 Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
***********************************************************




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>