<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] RE: Adrian Kinderis - SOI (nee DOI)
- To: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] RE: Adrian Kinderis - SOI (nee DOI)
- From: William Drake <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:36:52 +0200
- Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A1462FD@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A1462FB@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3F5A1462FD@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi Adrian
On Oct 7, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
> Hells Bells.
>
> Sorry folks. That is my Declaration of Interest.
>
> I believe it holds true for the upcoming meeting as most topics are on new
> gTLD’s.
>
> P.S. What is the point of all this? How would a DOI differ on a meeting to
> meeting basis from a SOI?
5.1 says an SOI pertains to "the Relevant Party's judgment, any matters to be
considered by the GNSO Group" [sic], whereas a DOI pertains to "the Relevant
Party's judgment on a specific issue," which presumably does not fall within
the scope of "any matters"…(?)
> What is the penalty should I not do a DOI?
5.6 Failure to Comply only addresses an SOI, which is to be provided "prior to
the start of a GNSO meeting"…(?)
Probably I'm missing something, but in retrospect the language may have merited
more discussion prior to approving the motion…
Best,
Bill
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Adrian Kinderis
> Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2010 8:40 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Adrian Kinderis - SOI
>
> Adrian Kinderis - Registrar Constituency
>
> I am Chief Executive Officer of AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd a company based in
> Melbourne, Australia and an ICANN accredited Registrar and member of the
> Registrar Constituency.
> The AusRegistry Group of companies includes;
>
> - AusRegistry Pty Ltd which is
> · the Registry Services provider for all second level .au domain names
>
> - AusRegistry International Pty Ltd which is
> · a Registry Consultancy Service
> · a Registry Software and infrastructure provider for ccTLD’s
> (including IDN ccTLD’s)
> · a Registry Software and infrastructure provider around new gTLD’s
> (including IDN gTLD’s)
> · AusRegistry International currently has no plans to apply for any
> new gTLD’s as a gTLD applicant (In other words there is no real change to our
> underlying business model - of providing technology services for Domain Name
> Registries and Registration)
>
> I hold the position of Director in all companies above.
>
> None of the companies within the AusRegistry Group are affiliated with any
> current gTLD Registry operator with the exception of AusRegistry Pty Ltd of
> which Afilias has a minority shareholding.
> I am not in possession of any gTLD Registry proprietary or sensitive
> information, nor have I ever been. I am not an officer, director, consultant,
> or employee of any other member of this Constituency or any other ICANN
> Constituency. I like to collect butterflies.
>
>
> Adrian Kinderis
>
>
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
***********************************************************
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|