Re: AW: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG

[tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]

I think we (the Council) have enough to go on to make a decision about it. The 
very fact that they are submitting a "final" report tells us that we either 
need to reconstitute this PDP under a new charter or end it all together. This 
is our call at this point, not the WGs.

Tim

-----Original Message-----
From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:32:38 
To: <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: AW: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG  

I don't agree with your change Wolf unless it is confirmed by the WG chairs.

My understanding is the same as Chucks: they are currently in discussion with 
the group on next steps and nothing has been decided yet.

Stéphane

Le 30 sept. 2010 à 15:19, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> I've inserted an amendment in the "Whereas..." which reflects the co-chairs' 
> response - as mentioned in my E-Mail earlier today and would be glad you 
> accept this as friendly.
> 
> Best regards 
> Wolf-Ulrich
> 
> Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
> Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. September 2010 14:37
> An: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
> Betreff: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG 
> 
> I  am accepting one of Adrian’s suggested amendments to this motion as 
> friendly and change it as highlighted in the attached file.  Other suggested 
> amendments are welcome.  Note also that a second is needed.
> 
> Chuck <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc>>
> 
> 
>_____________________________________________
> From: Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Motion re. VI WG
> 
> 
>  << File: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc >>
> 
> In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI and in order to meet 
> the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am submitting this motion and 
> would appreciate a second.  Please forward this to your SGs and 
> constituencies to determine support for the motion on 7 October.
> 
> I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this, but thought that a 
> motion is a clear way to kick it off.
> 
> Chuck
> 
> <Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10 -WUK amend.doc>