AW: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG
I've inserted an amendment in the "Whereas..." which reflects the
co-chairs' response - as mentioned in my E-Mail earlier today and would
be glad you accept this as friendly.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 30. September 2010 14:37
An: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Betreff: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG
I am accepting one of Adrian's suggested amendments to this
motion as friendly and change it as highlighted in the attached file.
Other suggested amendments are welcome. Note also that a second is
needed.
Chuck <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep
10.doc>>
_____________________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Motion re. VI WG
<< File: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep
10.doc >>
In response to the Board retreat resolution
regarding VI and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for
motions, I am submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.
Please forward this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support
for the motion on 7 October.
I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing
this, but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.
Chuck
Attachment:
Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10 -WUK amend.doc
|