ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: Motion re. VI WG

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:36:50 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <8DF021A98B708045980B2056266E8E36FABEAF87@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8DF021A98B708045980B2056266E8E36FABEAF87@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Actf/ylTpAteaizMQ0K0HUGFC5+RogAnLWSQ
  • Thread-topic: Motion re. VI WG 
I  am accepting one of Adrian's suggested amendments to this motion as
friendly and change it as highlighted in the attached file.  Other
suggested amendments are welcome.  Note also that a second is needed.

Chuck <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc>> 

                _____________________________________________
                From: Gomes, Chuck 
                Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53 PM
                To: Council GNSO
                Subject: Motion re. VI WG 
                

                 << File: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc >> 
                In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI
and in order to meet the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am
submitting this motion and would appreciate a second.  Please forward
this to your SGs and constituencies to determine support for the motion
on 7 October.

                I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this,
but thought that a motion is a clear way to kick it off.

                Chuck

Attachment: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc
Description: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>