[council] RE: Motion re. VI WG

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I second.

Adrian Kinderis


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, 30 September 2010 10:37 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: [council] RE: Motion re. VI WG


I  am accepting one of Adrian's suggested amendments to this motion as friendly 
and change it as highlighted in the attached file.  Other suggested amendments 
are welcome.  Note also that a second is needed.

Chuck <<Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10 revised 30 Sep 10.doc>>

_____________________________________________
From: Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 1:53 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Motion re. VI WG

 << File: Motion - VI Board Response 29 Sep 10.doc >>

In response to the Board retreat resolution regarding VI and in order to meet 
the 8-day advance requirement for motions, I am submitting this motion and 
would appreciate a second.  Please forward this to your SGs and constituencies 
to determine support for the motion on 7 October.

I am not opposed to other ways of accomplishing this, but thought that a motion 
is a clear way to kick it off.

Chuck