AW: [council] Re-submission of the VI Motion for Sep 8th Council Meeting

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

This is a valuable hint. I'd like to come back to my suggestion just to
send the Executive Summary of the report together with some "comments"
made in the draft motion, such as
- Council recognizes that the Revised Initial Report does not include
any recommendations that have achieved a consensus within the VI Working
Group, and instead reflects the current state of the work of the VI
Working Group
- no endorsement or approval by the GNSO Council of the contents of the
Revised Initial Report at this time
- the Council still expects consensus recommendations in a final report
 

Best regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 


  _____  

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Im Auftrag von Bruce Tonkin
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 1. September 2010 01:35
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: RE: [council] Re-submission of the VI Motion for Sep 8th
Council Meeting 



Note that several Board members have been observing the working group
activities, and are aware of the initial report.   There is no
"requirement" to formally transmit the report, as the report is a public
document, and available to both the Board and the staff. 

 

The value in a motion such as that below, is an opportunity for the
Council to give some context/commentary on top of the initial report as
the body managing the policy development processes.

 

Regards,

Bruce Tonkin

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Caroline Greer
Sent: Wednesday, 1 September 2010 2:14 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Re-submission of the VI Motion for Sep 8th Council
Meeting 

 

Dear Council Members,

 

In advance of our next Council meeting on 8th September and in order to
meet the submission deadline of today, I would like to re-submit the
Motion to Forward the Revised Initial Report on the Vertical Integration
PDP to the ICANN Board. That motion is set out below.

 

Many thanks,

 

Kind regards,

 

Caroline.

 

**************************************************************

 

Whereas, on 28 January 2010, the GNSO Council approved a policy
development process (PDP) on the topic of vertical integration between
registries and registrars;

 

Whereas the VI Working Group has produced its Revised Initial Report and
has presented it to the GNSO Council on 18 August; and,

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council recognizes that the Revised Initial Report
does not include any recommendations that have achieved a consensus
within the VI Working Group, and instead reflects the current state of
the work of the VI Working Group;

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council has reviewed the Revised Initial Report, and
desires to forward the Revised Initial Report to the ICANN Board;

 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

 

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council appreciates the hard work and tremendous
effort shown by each member of the VI PDP working group in developing
the Revised Initial Report on an expedited basis;

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the Council hereby agrees to forward the Revised
Initial Report to the ICANN Board as a snapshot of the current state of
the ongoing deliberations of the VI Working Group with the understanding
that the VI Working Group will continue to work through these issues to
attempt to produce consensus recommendations in a final report.

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that this resolution is not an endorsement or approval
by the GNSO Council of the contents of the Revised Initial Report at
this time;     

 

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council directs Staff to make the
appropriate notifications to the ICANN Secretary and to the community.