Re: [council] Motion to Support Rec6 CWG

["Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>]

Yes I do
Regards
Olga

Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar) 

-----Original Message-----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:30:47 
To: Rosemary Sinclair<Rosemary.Sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Council 
GNSO<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ncsg-policy@xxxxxx>; <ncsg-ec@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to Support Rec6 CWG

Yes Rosemary, I would consider this to be a friendly amendment, noting that I 
think you meant the '2nd Whereas' clause instead of the '2nd Resolve' clause.

 

Olga, do you also accept this as friendly?

 

Chuck

 

From: Rosemary Sinclair [mailto:Rosemary.Sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2010 9:27 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Cc: ncsg-policy@xxxxxx; ncsg-ec@xxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to Support Rec6 CWG

 

Hi Chuck

 

NCSG have been looking at the motion re Rec6 CWG

 

Would you regard the following as a friendly amendment?

 

.... change the wording of the 2nd RESOLVED clause, which currently reads:

 

"WHEREAS, numerous stakeholders have expressed concerns about the proposed 
implementation of the GNSO Council's Recommendation 6 regarding procedures for 
addressing culturally objectionable and/or sensitive strings;"

 

to (proposed changes in bold) -

 

"WHEREAS, various stakeholders have expressed concerns about the proposed 
implementation of the GNSO Council's Recommendation 6 regarding strings that 
contravene generally-accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order 
that are recognized under international principles of law;"

 

To many of our members as well as NCSG colleagues on this working group, the 
new wording is a more accurate description of what Rec 6 states, as opposed to 
a broader concept of cultural "sensitivities" or "objectionable" strings.

 

Cheers

 

Rosemary

 

Rosemary Sinclair

Managing Director, ATUG

Chairman, INTUG

T: +61 2 94958901  F: +61 2 94193889

M: +61 413734490 

Email: rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rosemary.sinclair@xxxxxxxxxxx> 

Skype: rasinclair

 

Please visit the ATUG website for Updates and Information www.atug.com.au 

 

________________________________

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, 1 September 2010 3:01 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Motion to Support Rec6 CWG

 

It was suggested to me that it would be a good idea to document our support for 
the community working group that the GAC requested to discuss new gTLD 
recommendation 6 on morality and public order.  In follow-up to that 
suggestion, I am making the following motion.

Chuck

Motion To Support A Cross Community Working Group On New gTLD Recommendation 6

WHEREAS, ICANN aims to ensure that the New gTLD Program contains appropriate 
safeguards to address culturally objectionable and/or sensitive strings, while 
protecting internationally recognized freedom of expression rights;

WHEREAS, numerous stakeholders have expressed concerns about the proposed 
implementation of the GNSO Council's Recommendation 6 regarding procedures for 
addressing culturally objectionable and/or sensitive strings;

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council desires to participate in a joint working group with 
other interested Supporting Organizations (SO's) and Advisory Committee (AC's) 
to provide guidance to the ICANN new gTLD Implementation Team and the ICANN 
Board with regard to the implementation of recommendation 6;

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council supports the formation of a cross-community 
working group to provide guidance to the ICANN new gTLD Implementation Team and 
the ICANN Board with regard to the implementation of recommendation 6;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that Stéphane Van Gelder shall serve as the GNSO Council 
Liaison for this cross-community working group until 13 September 2010;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that the GNSO Council approves the Terms of Reference 
<http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/new-gtld-final-recommendations-6-community-wg-25aug10-en.pdf>
  to guide the activities of this cross-community working group;

RESOLVED FURTHER, that ICANN Staff shall identify and assign applicable Staff 
support for this working group and arrange for support tools such as a mailing 
list, website and other tools as needed.