<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
- To: "'Gomes, Chuck'" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
- From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:45:23 -0400
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0703589BBF@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acsz6I+pRlkujKwBTN+Jpt1Ps4VnOwAC8wOw
- Thread-topic: Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
It could be sleep deprivation, but the third "Further resolved" doesn't seem to
make any sense. Is it missing any words or is it me?
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:20 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
Importance: High
On behalf of the RySG, I would like to propose an amended version of the motion
to proceed with Whois Study # 1 on misuse. The proposed changes are
highlighted in the attached file.
<<Motion Amendment for GNSO Council WHOIS Study 1 - 4 Aug 2010.docx>>
In my role as chair, I would like to ask Mike Rodenbaugh, who made the original
motion, and Terry Davis, who seconded the motion, if they would consider the
amendments friendly.
Chuck
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|