ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1

  • To: <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:48:27 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <03e001cb33ea$e0660fa0$a1322ee0$@com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0703589BBF@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <03e001cb33ea$e0660fa0$a1322ee0$@com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acsz6I+pRlkujKwBTN+Jpt1Ps4VnOwAAisfQAABqJpA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1

Yes Mike.  I did see that from Terry so we will consider the amendments
as friendly.

 

Thanks for the quick response.

 

Chuck

 

From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 11:37 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1

 

Thanks Chuck, yes I consider the amended motion as friendly.  I believe
Terry has privately seconded that notion to you and I as well, but may
be traveling and unavailable for our call tomorrow.

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

RODENBAUGH LAW

tel/fax:  +1 (415) 738-8087

http://rodenbaugh.com <http://rodenbaugh.com/> 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2010 8:20 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Amendment to Motion to Pursue Whois Study # 1
Importance: High

 

On behalf of the RySG, I would like to propose an amended version of the
motion to proceed with Whois Study # 1 on misuse.  The proposed changes
are highlighted in the attached file.

<<Motion Amendment for GNSO Council WHOIS Study 1 - 4 Aug 2010.docx>> 

In my role as chair, I would like to ask Mike Rodenbaugh, who made the
original motion, and Terry Davis, who seconded the motion, if they would
consider the amendments friendly.

Chuck



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>