ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings


I am willing to put this forward as a friendly amendment if that can help.

Thanks,

Stéphane

Le 20 juin 2010 à 11:38, Gomes, Chuck a écrit :

> Bill/Olga,
>  
> I had asked Staff to try to have the estimated cost info in advance of our 
> meeting this week, but, as you can see, it looks like that is not possible.  
> Would you consider amending your motion as requested by Liz?
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: Liz Gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 20, 2010 5:26 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck; Caroline Greer; Rafik Dammak
> Cc: William Drake; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings
>  
> All,
>  
> We are still working on this request.  I do not want to respond prematurely, 
> as there are several options to consider.  Because of how little time we have 
> had to explore this, I would like to propose that the Council consider a 
> friendly amendment.  Would the Council be willing to consider the following :
>  
> RESOLVED that the Council asks staff to determine the costs associated with 
> audiocasting all GNSO Council teleconference meetings (in addition to being 
> recorded) so that members of the community can listen in real time. Staff is 
> asked to provide this information to the Council prior to its meeting on 15 
> July 2010.
> Thanks, Liz
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 6:34 PM
> To: Caroline Greer; Rafik Dammak
> Cc: William Drake; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings
>  
> Staff will try to get some rough cost estimates of a couple alternative ways 
> of doing this before our meeting on the 23rd.  In particular, Liz has sent a 
> request to the ICANN IT department.
>  
> Chuck
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Caroline Greer
> Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2010 11:23 AM
> To: Rafik Dammak
> Cc: William Drake; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings
>  
> Thanks Rafik (and Bill also).
>  
> I have no clue about the costs associated with such things so I was just 
> trying to get a handle on it. Sounds like a very low level cost from what you 
> both say.
>  
> Kind regards,
>  
> Caroline.
>  
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
> Sent: 15 June 2010 16:16
> To: Caroline Greer
> Cc: William Drake; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings
>  
> Hi Caroline,
>  
> I was active in WG about remote participation for Internet Governance Forum, 
> and my understanding is that cost wasn't a barrier for setup either audiocast 
> or videocast. 
> I am even in contact with team from Politechnico Torino which help IGF 
> secretariat to setup video and audio streaming for each IGF open consultation 
> and they only request a reliable bandwidth Internet connection.
>  
> Rafik
> 
> 2010/6/16 Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Many thanks Rafik. Can we define ‘not so expensive’?
>  
> Caroline.
>  
> From: Rafik Dammak [mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: 15 June 2010 16:08
> To: Caroline Greer
> Cc: William Drake; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings
>  
> Hi Caroline,
>  
> audiocast is different to what as councilors we use for confcall. it is just 
> classic audio streaming and it is not so expensive to be setup. 
>  
> Regards
>  
> Rafik
>  
> 2010/6/15 Caroline Greer <cgreer@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Bill,
> 
> Do you know if we have a cost estimate for the set-up of real-time audio
> calls? I think we might need that information in order to consider the
> motion.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Caroline.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of William Drake
> Sent: 15 June 2010 10:03
> To: GNSO Council List
> Subject: [council] Motion on Transparency of Council Meetings
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> In light of the bit of conversation over the past couple days concerning
> the relationship between Council members and their SGs, the ATRT process
> and our pending meeting with them, and internal discussions in NCSG, I
> hear by make the following motion.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> MOTION ON ENHANCING THE TRANSPARENCY OF GNSO COUNCIL MEETINGS
> 
> WHEREAS the Affirmation of Commitments mandates that ICANN processes be
> made as transparent as possible;
> 
> WHEREAS the GNSO Council seeks to promote broad community awareness of
> and engagement in GNSO activities;
> 
> WHEREAS the GNSO Council is a management team whose elected members
> represent their respective Stakeholder Groups in a manner determined by
> those Stakeholder Groups;
> 
> WHEREAS this representation function would be enhanced if Stakeholder
> Group members were able to listen in real time to Council meetings; and
> 
> WHEREAS it would be impractical to open the GNSO Council meeting
> teleconference facility to Stakeholder Group members;
> 
> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
> 
> RESOLVED that beginning in July 2010, all GNSO Council teleconference
> meetings will be audiocast (in addition to being recorded) so that
> members of the community can listen in real time.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ***********************************************************
> William J. Drake
> Senior Associate
> Centre for International Governance
> Graduate Institute of International and
>  Development Studies
> Geneva, Switzerland
> william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
> www.linkedin.com/in/williamjdrake
> ***********************************************************
> 
>  
>  



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>